-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
continue nll transition by removing stuff #98584
Conversation
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #98396) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
dd207e7
to
c12ce93
Compare
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
So, I still want to remove edit: storing a |
anyways, I think this by itself is already ready for review |
Woot |
will wait with perf for #98641 to get merged because that one is already an improvement by itself |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #93967) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
ff8f8bb
to
9f95c60
Compare
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 9f95c60 with merge a0e3c03d817ba6c1911e8451ea12867b6e75a770... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued a0e3c03d817ba6c1911e8451ea12867b6e75a770 with parent a3beeaa, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (a0e3c03d817ba6c1911e8451ea12867b6e75a770): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
alright 👍 |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 9f95c60 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (efb171e): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)Results
CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
r? @jackh726 for now
building on #98641