Skip to content

Conversation

madhav-madhusoodanan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 18, 2025

r? @sayantn

rustbot has assigned @sayantn.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Comment on lines +263 to +270
- tuple: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
os: ubuntu-latest
- tuple: armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
os: ubuntu-latest
- tuple: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
os: ubuntu-latest
- tuple: aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu
os: ubuntu-latest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shell: bash
- run: rustup target add ${{ matrix.target.tuple }}
shell: bash
if: matrix.build_std == ''
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just

Suggested change
if: matrix.build_std == ''
if: matrix.build_std

should work I think?

rustup component add rust-src
echo "CARGO_UNSTABLE_BUILD_STD=std" >> $GITHUB_ENV
shell: bash
if: matrix.build_std != ''
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if: matrix.build_std != ''
if: ${{ (matrix.build_std || false) == false }}

is the best I can think of

Comment on lines +10 to +11
#export RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE=1
#export RUST_TEST_THREADS=1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we are not (currently) running RUST_TEST, so I think this can be removed?

Comment on lines +46 to +50
echo "OBJDUMP=${OBJDUMP}"
echo "STDARCH_DISABLE_ASSERT_INSTR=${STDARCH_DISABLE_ASSERT_INSTR}"
echo "STDARCH_TEST_EVERYTHING=${STDARCH_TEST_EVERYTHING}"
echo "STDARCH_TEST_SKIP_FEATURE=${STDARCH_TEST_SKIP_FEATURE}"
echo "STDARCH_TEST_SKIP_FUNCTION=${STDARCH_TEST_SKIP_FUNCTION}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these are not needed?

Comment on lines +58 to +60
x86_64* | i686*)
export STDARCH_DISABLE_ASSERT_INSTR=1
;;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this can likely wait until the x86 PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants