Upgrade Singular #13237

jdemeyer · 2012-07-12T14:01:11Z

Upgrade Singular to version 3-1-5 (released 12 July 2012).

Upstream bugs discovered:

#437: negate() should be NTL::negate() (upstream needs testers)
#438: Singular configured --without-debug doesn't build ("fixed" by removing the option)
#439: factorize() returns wrong constant (fixed upstream, but not in a stable release)
#440: Factoring over a finite field returns reducible factor (fixed upstream, but not in a stable release)
#441: Factoring over a finite field sometimes returns wrong result (fixed upstream, but not in a stable release)
#443: configure should check for nanosleep in -lrt (fixed upstream, but not in a stable release)

This new version fixes #13129, #12918, #12928, #12846, #12089, #13344.

Apply attachment: 13237_singular_3_1_5.patch and attachment: 13237_tests.patch to the Sage library.

New spkg: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/singular-3-1-5.p1.spkg

singular-3-1-5.p1 (Simon King, 29 August 2012)

Trac Upgrade Singular #13237: add patch install_table.patch

singular-3-1-5.p0 (Jeroen Demeyer, Alexander Dreyer, 10 August 2012)

Trac Upgrade Singular #13237: Upgrade to version 3-1-5.
Removed patches which are now upstreamed:
- patches/Singular.Makefile.in.shared.patch
- patches/Singular.configure.patch
- patches/factory.GNUmakefile.in.patch
- patches/factory_configure
- patches/make_parallel.patch
- patches/os_x_ppc.patch
In spkg-install, simplify apply_patches(), automatically apply all
patches in patches/*.patch, move conditional patches to
patches/conditional
Rename some patches such that they all have the extension '.patch'
Put the two patches for SAGE_DEBUG (Singular.Makefile.in.debug.patch
and kernel.Makefile.in.debug.patch) into one file
conditional/sage_debug.patch.
Add several patches (see above):
- NTL_negate.patch
- singular_trac_439.patch
- singular_trac_440.patch
- singular_trac_441.patch
- singular_trac_443.patch
- sage_trac_12089.patch
- slibdir.patch
When building Singular, don't first make install and then
make install-nolns. Instead, only do the latter.
Don't create the LIB->lib symlink, which is no longer needed.
In spkg-install, remove distclean() step; merge clean_headers() and
part of the old distclean() into remove_old_version().
Only unset LD on Darwin.
Remove the unsetting of TMPDIR (bug fixed upstream).
Do not override user-set CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS.
Echo all error messages to stderr instead of stdout.
Fix various ./configure options and remove some unsupported options.
Always configure --with-debug, as --without-debug doesn't work, see
http://www.singular.uni-kl.de:8002/trac/ticket/438
Don't create sage_singular symlink, which wasn't used anyway.
Replace the $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/Singular script by a symlink.
Remove workaround for GCC-4.0.x on Darwin (obsolete by the GCC spkg).
Fix formatting of spkg-install (consistent indentation, no TABs).

Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning.

CC: @kiwifb @malb @jpflori

Component: packages: standard

Keywords: Singular spkg

Author: Jeroen Demeyer, Alexander Dreyer, Dmitrii Pasechnik, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jean-Pierre Flori

Reviewer: Alexander Dreyer, François Bissey

Merged: sage-5.4.beta0

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13237

nexttime · 2012-07-12T15:26:19Z

Changed keywords from none to spkg

jdemeyer · 2012-07-25T14:39:16Z

Author: Jeroen Demeyer

jdemeyer · 2012-07-25T14:39:16Z

Changed keywords from spkg to Singular spkg

nexttime · 2012-07-25T15:07:38Z

comment:6

checking for FLINT >= 2.3... not found
configure: WARNING: Unable to find FLINT (which is strongly recommended) on your machine: please use --with-flint=PATH_TO_DIR_CONTAINING_LIB_AND_INCLUDE (see also ./configure --help if you do not understand what we are talking about)

:P

And lots of other warnings...

nexttime · 2012-07-25T17:14:17Z

comment:7

Replying to @nexttime:

And lots of other warnings...

These are the ones I get from configure and config.status:

configure: warning: Building of doc might fail. Need Texinfo
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apint, --with-ntl, --without-MP, --without-lex, --without-bison, --without-Boost, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-factory, --with-libfac
configure: WARNING: Unable to find FLINT (which is strongly recommended) on your machine: please use --with-flint=PATH_TO_DIR_CONTAINING_LIB_AND_INCLUDE (see also ./configure --help if you do not understand what we are talking about)
config.status: WARNING:  'GNUmakefile.in' seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apint, --with-ntl, --without-MP, --without-lex, --without-bison, --without-Boost, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-factory, --with-libfac
configure: warning: factory.h not found! Install factory before building libfac!
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-gmp, --with-ntl, --without-bison, --enable-gmp, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-Singular
configure: WARNING: building without lex -- make might fail
configure: WARNING: building without python support
configure: WARNING: Unable to find FLINT (which is strongly recommended) on your machine: please use --with-flint=PATH_TO_DIR_CONTAINING_LIB_AND_INCLUDE (see also ./configure --help if you do not understand what we are talking about)
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-gmp, --with-ntl, --without-bison, --enable-gmp, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-Singular
configure: warning: Building of doc might fail. Need Texinfo
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apint, --with-ntl, --without-MP, --without-lex, --without-bison, --without-Boost, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-factory, --with-libfac
configure: WARNING: Unable to find FLINT (which is strongly recommended) on your machine: please use --with-flint=PATH_TO_DIR_CONTAINING_LIB_AND_INCLUDE (see also ./configure --help if you do not understand what we are talking about)
config.status: WARNING:  'GNUmakefile.in' seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apint, --with-ntl, --without-MP, --without-lex, --without-bison, --without-Boost, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-factory, --with-libfac
configure: warning: factory.h not found! Install factory before building libfac!
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-gmp, --with-ntl, --without-bison, --enable-gmp, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-Singular
configure: WARNING: building without lex -- make might fail
configure: WARNING: building without python support
configure: WARNING: Unable to find FLINT (which is strongly recommended) on your machine: please use --with-flint=PATH_TO_DIR_CONTAINING_LIB_AND_INCLUDE (see also ./configure --help if you do not understand what we are talking about)
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-gmp, --with-ntl, --without-bison, --enable-gmp, --enable-Singular, --enable-factory, --enable-libfac, --enable-IntegerProgramming, --disable-doc, --with-malloc, --disable-debug, --enable-omalloc, --with-external-config_h, --with-track-custom, --enable-Plural, --with-Singular
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apint, --with-ntl, --disable-debug
configure: WARNING: Unable to find FLINT (which is strongly recommended) on your machine: please use --with-flint=PATH_TO_DIR_CONTAINING_LIB_AND_INCLUDE (see also ./configure --help if you do not understand what we are talking about)
config.status: WARNING:  'GNUmakefile.in' seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-apint, --with-ntl, --disable-debug

The unrecognized options should be addressed I think.

No idea how to interpret "factory.h not found! Install factory before building libfac!", as the build succeeded.

"Building without python support" can safely be ignored I guess, as we use our own Cython wrappers.

jdemeyer · 2012-07-26T13:26:03Z

comment:8

Replying to @nexttime:

The unrecognized options should be addressed I think.

I fixed the fixable warnings. Many of them are caused by recursive calling of configure, for example, the top-level configure calls omalloc/configure. Many options are supported by some (but not all) configure scripts. These will give warnings and I don't see how to avoid these.

nexttime · 2012-07-26T13:46:01Z

comment:10

I assume that this is work in progress (i.e., you haven't tried to fix doctest errors yet).

Anyway, here's what I got on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS x86_64, with Sage 5.2.rc0 and GCC 4.7.0:

The following tests failed:

	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/constructions/polynomials.rst # 1 doctests failed
	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py # 1 doctests failed
	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx # 3 doctests failed
	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py # 1 doctests failed
	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/calculus/wester.py # 1 doctests failed
	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx # 2 doctests failed
	sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/combinat/words/words.py # 0 doctests failed

(The last failure was a segfault with a large traceback IIRC. Somewhat surprisingly successfully compiled with -O3, although many if not most compile commands override this by -O2; looks as if they use CPPFLAGS instead of CXXFLAGS in some parts.)

Let me know in case you're interested in further output; I guess you can reproduce most of the errors.

jdemeyer · 2012-07-26T13:52:15Z

comment:11

Replying to @nexttime:

I assume that this is work in progress (i.e., you haven't tried to fix doctest errors yet).

Exactly, I mainly worked on spkg-install.

jdemeyer · 2012-07-26T14:05:37Z

comment:12

This is a new bug, the new answer is incorrect:

sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "/release/merger/sage-5.2.rc1/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx", line 3856:
    sage: p.factor()
Expected:
    (-2*v^2*u + 4*u^3 + v^2)^2
Got:
    (4) * (-2*v^2*u + 4*u^3 + v^2)^2
**********************************************************************

nexttime · 2012-07-26T14:15:39Z

comment:13

Replying to @jdemeyer:

This is a new bug, the new answer is incorrect:
Expected:
    (-2*v^2*u + 4*u^3 + v^2)^2
Got:
    (4) * (-2*v^2*u + 4*u^3 + v^2)^2

Yes, the most obvious one... :-)

Just noticed the failure in words.py apparently isn't reproducible. Traceback was


${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libcsage.so(print_backtrace+0x31)[0x2abd9e8f6664]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libcsage.so(sigdie+0x14)[0x2abd9e8f6696]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler+0x218)[0x2abd9e8f6250]
/lib/libpthread.so.0(+0xf8f0)[0x2abd9c9158f0]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(+0x135020)[0x2abd9c628020]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(+0x76aa7)[0x2abd9c569aa7]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(+0x1352b7)[0x2abd9c6282b7]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(_PyObject_GC_Malloc+0x115)[0x2abd9c6292b5]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(_PyObject_GC_New+0xd)[0x2abd9c6292ed]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyCFunction_NewEx+0xc5)[0x2abd9c584f05]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(Py_InitModule4_64+0x140)[0x2abd9c60bc60]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/python/site-packages/numpy/core/multiarray.so(initmultiarray+0x2b)[0x2abdcd07186b]
${SAGE_LOCAL}/lib/libpython2.7.so.1.0(_PyImport_LoadDynamicModule+0x99)[0x2abd9c6073b9]
...
Segmentation fault

jdemeyer · 2012-07-26T15:52:17Z

comment:15

Another Singular bug:

sage -t --long "devel/sage/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/release/merger/sage-5.2.rc1/devel/sage/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py", line 1132:
    sage: f.factor()
Expected:
    (1/t) * (X + 3*t) * (X + 5*t) * (X + 6*t) * (X^2 + 1/t) * (X^2 + 6/t)
Got:
    (1/t) * (X + 3*t) * (X + 5*t) * (X + 6*t) * (X^4 + 6/t^2)
**********************************************************************

Reported upstream at http://www.singular.uni-kl.de:8002/trac/ticket/440.

jdemeyer · 2012-08-01T11:25:30Z

Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning.

jdemeyer · 2012-08-01T11:25:30Z

comment:17

New spkg, adds fixes for Singular bugs 439 and 440.

jdemeyer · 2012-08-01T12:22:10Z

comment:20

Reproducible doctest failure:

**********************************************************************
File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/devel/sage-main/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx", line 1569:
    sage: singular_list(2, 3, 6, ring=P)
Exception raised:
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
        self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
      File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
        OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
      File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
        compileflags, 1) in test.globs
      File "<doctest __main__.example_72[16]>", line 1, in <module>
        singular_list(Integer(2), Integer(3), Integer(6), ring=P)###line 1569:
    sage: singular_list(2, 3, 6, ring=P)
      File "function.pyx", line 1248, in sage.libs.singular.function.SingularFunction.__call__ (sage/libs/singular/function.cpp:11875)
        return call_function(self, args, ring, interruptible, attributes)
      File "function.pyx", line 1438, in sage.libs.singular.function.call_function (sage/libs/singular/function.cpp:13425)
        raise RuntimeError("Error in Singular function call '%s':\n%s"%(self._name,
    RuntimeError: Error in Singular function call 'list':
     list(`int`,`int`,`int`) failed
**********************************************************************
File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/devel/sage-main/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx", line 1585:
    sage: singular_list((1,2,3),3,[1,2,3], ring=P)
Exception raised:
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1231, in run_one_test
        self.run_one_example(test, example, filename, compileflags)
      File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/local/bin/sagedoctest.py", line 38, in run_one_example
        OrigDocTestRunner.run_one_example(self, test, example, filename, compileflags)
      File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/local/bin/ncadoctest.py", line 1172, in run_one_example
        compileflags, 1) in test.globs
      File "<doctest __main__.example_72[26]>", line 1, in <module>
        singular_list((Integer(1),Integer(2),Integer(3)),Integer(3),[Integer(1),Integer(2),Integer(3)], ring=P)###line 1585:
    sage: singular_list((1,2,3),3,[1,2,3], ring=P)
      File "function.pyx", line 1248, in sage.libs.singular.function.SingularFunction.__call__ (sage/libs/singular/function.cpp:11875)
        return call_function(self, args, ring, interruptible, attributes)
      File "function.pyx", line 1438, in sage.libs.singular.function.call_function (sage/libs/singular/function.cpp:13425)
        raise RuntimeError("Error in Singular function call '%s':\n%s"%(self._name,
    RuntimeError: Error in Singular function call 'list':
     list(`intvec`,`int`,`list`) failed
**********************************************************************

Non-reproducible doctest failure:

**********************************************************************
File "/release/merger/sage-5.3.beta0/devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx", line 3921:
    sage: f.factor()
Expected:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + (a)*x^8 + (a)*y^4)
Got:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + (a + 1)*x^8 + (a + 1)*y^4)
**********************************************************************

nexttime · 2012-08-01T15:31:04Z

comment:21

So far I only tested the files that previously failed for me (with the new spkg and the Sage library patch applied).

I get the same list() errors (although prepended by some debug output it seems, before the doctest error is printed), and sporadically the f.factor() error -- with varying results:

sage -t --long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "${SAGE_ROOT}/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx", line 3910:
    sage: f.factor()
Expected:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + (a)*x^8 + (a)*y^4)
Got:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + (a + 1)*x^8 + (a + 1)*y^4)
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
   1 of  86 in __main__.example_77
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.

sage -t --long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "${SAGE_ROOT}/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx", line 3910:
    sage: f.factor()
Expected:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + (a)*x^8 + (a)*y^4)
Got:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9)
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
   1 of  86 in __main__.example_77
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.

sage -t --long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "${SAGE_ROOT}/devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx", line 3910:
    sage: f.factor()
Expected:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + (a)*x^8 + (a)*y^4)
Got:
    x * y^3 * (y^8 + (a)*y^7 + (a + 1)*x) * (x^7*y^3 + x*y^9 + x^8 + y^4)
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
   1 of  86 in __main__.example_77
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.

(For me it's line 3910; presumably due to some other patch. The first variant seems to occur more often. All tests run sequentially, FWIW.)

P.S.: Run 100 times from the shell, the test failed 51 times.

alexanderdreyer · 2012-08-27T10:46:52Z

comment:73

Replying to @jdemeyer:

Additional patch attachment: 13237_tests.patch needs review.

Indeed, I can confirm that the tests check for recurrence of the solved problems.

simon-king-jena · 2012-08-27T15:32:01Z

comment:74

There is a small thing that I'd like to change: There is a header table.h, that is currently not installed. However, it is needed by libsing (not libsingular).

libsing is a package allowing GAP to use Singular natively. I don't know if it would be of general interest to have it in Sage. Anyway: Should there be a new ticket for the installation of table.h, or should it be done here?

alexanderdreyer · 2012-08-27T15:45:59Z

comment:75

Replying to @simon-king-jena:

There is a small thing that I'd like to change: There is a header table.h, that is currently not installed. However, it is needed by libsing (not libsingular).

libsing is a package allowing GAP to use Singular natively. I don't know if it would be of general interest to have it in Sage. Anyway: Should there be a new ticket for the installation of table.h, or should it be done here?

I think this is not related tot he upgrade, so this should be a feature request to the Singular-team. But of course, any resulting patch could be integrated in the next spkg eventually.

simon-king-jena · 2012-08-27T17:17:53Z

comment:76

It seems to me that the spkg contains uncommitted changes.

jdemeyer · 2012-08-28T07:11:53Z

comment:77

Replying to @simon-king-jena:

It seems to me that the spkg contains uncommitted changes.

You are very right, I forgot to do sage --pkg after committing the changes. Should be fixed now.

simon-king-jena · 2012-08-28T07:38:36Z

comment:78

Replying to @alexanderdreyer:

Replying to @simon-king-jena:
I think this is not related tot he upgrade,

Granted. But if we upgrade Singular anyway, we could as well use a little patch that installs just one additional header.

so this should be a feature request to the Singular-team. But of course, any resulting patch could be integrated in the next spkg eventually.

Here is the suggested change, anyway. Add a file patches/install_table.patch containing

--- src/Singular/Makefile.in    2012-07-11 11:00:13.000000000 +0100
+++ src/Singular/Makefile.in    2012-08-27 16:22:26.013159361 +0100
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@
          ${INSTALL_PROGRAM}  $$file ${libdir}; \
        done
        ${INSTALL_PROGRAM} libsingular.h ${includedir}
-       for file in subexpr.h tok.h grammar.h ipid.h lists.h ipshell.h attrib.h; do \
+       for file in subexpr.h tok.h grammar.h ipid.h lists.h ipshell.h attrib.h table.h; do \
        sed -e "s:<kernel/:<singular/:" < $$file |sed -e "s:<Singular/:<singular/:"|sed -e "s:<omalloc/:<:"|sed -e "s:<factory/:<:" >${includedir}/singular/$$file ;\
        done

jdemeyer · 2012-08-28T09:28:18Z

comment:79

I agree with AlexanderDreyer that you should make a request to upstream for table.h to be installed. If the patch gets accepted upstream, it will also be easier to review this ticket.

simon-king-jena · 2012-08-28T09:43:15Z

comment:80

Replying to @jdemeyer:

I agree with AlexanderDreyer that you should make a request to upstream for table.h to be installed. If the patch gets accepted upstream, it will also be easier to review this ticket.

I asked Hans Schönemann today, and he answered: "Meinetwegen."

In English, I guess that's: "I don't mind."

jdemeyer · 2012-08-29T09:39:39Z

Attachment: singular-3-1-5.p1.diff.gz

Diff for the singular spkg p0->p1. For reference / review only.

alexanderdreyer · 2012-08-29T09:42:52Z

comment:83

Replying to @jdemeyer:
I'll give a positive review to this (was discussed before),

simon-king-jena · 2012-08-29T09:50:56Z

comment:84

One questions regarding Alexander's comment on #7797: Has it really been the case on Solaris SPARC that an outdated Singular/tok.h was hanging around? And if the answer is yes, a second question: Has the new singular spkg not properly installed the new one?

jdemeyer · 2012-08-29T09:55:14Z

comment:85

I am currently doing a complete build from scratch on Solaris SPARC with the new Singular to find out what's going on.

simon-king-jena · 2012-08-30T17:29:13Z

comment:86

Replying to @jdemeyer:

I am currently doing a complete build from scratch on Solaris SPARC with the new Singular to find out what's going on.

What came out of it?

jdemeyer · 2012-08-30T17:57:58Z

comment:87

Replying to @simon-king-jena:

What came out of it?

I'll answer at #7797 when it's finished compiling (which should be soon now) :-)

jdemeyer · 2012-09-03T12:52:54Z

Merged: sage-5.4.beta0

jdemeyer added this to the sage-5.3 milestone Jul 12, 2012

jdemeyer added c: packages: standard labels Jul 12, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

jdemeyer added the s: needs review label Aug 27, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Aug 27, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

jdemeyer added s: needs work and removed s: positive review labels Aug 29, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin added s: positive review and removed s: needs review labels Aug 29, 2012

jdemeyer removed the s: positive review label Sep 3, 2012

jdemeyer closed this as completed Sep 3, 2012

simon-king-jena mentioned this issue Aug 28, 2012

Full interface to letterplace from singular #7797

Closed

This was referenced Sep 3, 2012

Singular does not build on Cygwin - static libs problem #12089

Closed

on CYGWIN, Singular LIB files get copied to SAGELOCAL/lib #13344

Closed

Upgrade Singular #13237

Upgrade Singular #13237

Comments

jdemeyer commented Jul 12, 2012

singular-3-1-5.p1 (Simon King, 29 August 2012)

singular-3-1-5.p0 (Jeroen Demeyer, Alexander Dreyer, 10 August 2012)

nexttime mannequin commented Jul 12, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

jdemeyer commented Jul 25, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

jdemeyer commented Jul 25, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

nexttime mannequin commented Jul 25, 2012

nexttime mannequin commented Jul 25, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 26, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

nexttime mannequin commented Jul 26, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 26, 2012

jdemeyer commented Jul 26, 2012

nexttime mannequin commented Jul 26, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

jdemeyer commented Jul 26, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

jdemeyer commented Aug 1, 2012

jdemeyer commented Aug 1, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

jdemeyer commented Aug 1, 2012

nexttime mannequin commented Aug 1, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Aug 27, 2012

simon-king-jena commented Aug 27, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Aug 27, 2012

simon-king-jena commented Aug 27, 2012

jdemeyer commented Aug 28, 2012

simon-king-jena commented Aug 28, 2012

jdemeyer commented Aug 28, 2012

simon-king-jena commented Aug 28, 2012

This comment has been minimized.

jdemeyer commented Aug 29, 2012

alexanderdreyer mannequin commented Aug 29, 2012

simon-king-jena commented Aug 29, 2012

jdemeyer commented Aug 29, 2012

simon-king-jena commented Aug 30, 2012

jdemeyer commented Aug 30, 2012

jdemeyer commented Sep 3, 2012