New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Segmentation fault when calculating the taylor series of a specific function #31401
Comments
comment:1
This is a maxima bug:
I tested with some other nonzero integers |
Changed keywords from none to maxima, taylor series |
comment:2
Replying to @DaveWitteMorris:
This seems to be the case, except if I will file a bug report on the maxima bug tracker. Should I close the ticket here? |
comment:3
Thanks for volunteering to report the bug to maxima (and for clarifying that Please keep this ticket open. The "Report Upstream" field of this ticket should be set to "Reported upstream. No feedback yet", and that field can be updated as the situation progresses. It would also be helpful if you can add a comment here with a link to the maxima bug report, so it is easy for sage trac followers to check on the status in maxima. |
comment:4
PS If you need a workaround for the bug, you can replace
|
Upstream: Reported upstream. No feedback yet. |
comment:5
Upstream ticket in the Maxima bug tracker: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:6
Moving to 9.4, as 9.3 has been released. |
The following code evaluated in Sage 9.2 leads to a segmentation fault
The error message is
Changing the constant slightly gives the desired result, e.g.
evaluates to
Upstream report:
Upstream: Reported upstream. No feedback yet.
Component: calculus
Keywords: maxima, taylor series
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31401
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: