Skip to content
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
30 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
0c9f56b
Implement high-priority improvements from improvements_plan.md
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
332d4cc
Enhance I2S error handling with error classification and health checks
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
687ff3b
Complete Phase 2 implementation with I2S error handling enhancements
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
4898b51
Implement adaptive buffer management and TCP connection state machine…
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
c9dcba4
Update .gitignore and enhance README.md for improved documentation an…
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
e7a3161
Refactor and enhance ESP32 Audio Streamer for improved reliability an…
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
28b314b
Implement adaptive jitter management and enhance TCP connection handl…
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
d8672fe
Enhance configuration and logging for network stability and performance
sarpel Oct 20, 2025
04375a6
Clean up deprecated files and workspace consolidation
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
ccce8f7
Fix compilation errors: Add includes and enum naming fixes
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
eb7a6af
Reduce compilation errors from 383 to 213 (44% reduction)
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
bfdb78f
Add comprehensive TODO.md documenting compilation fixes and remaining…
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
996f831
Phase 2a fixes: Logger signatures, enum namespacing, C++11 compatibility
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
66bb170
Update TODO.md with Phase 2a completion summary
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
bea110d
Final Phase 2a documentation - Comprehensive TODO.md update
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
794e7e4
Phase 2c: Fix remaining compilation errors - achieve full compilation…
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
f5ab2f6
Update TODO.md: Document Phase 2c completion and 100% compilation suc…
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
d20994d
Phase 1: Network Resilience - Core components implementation
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
3bd5d59
Phases 1-4: Comprehensive Reliability Enhancements - Core Components …
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
d04ecc5
Add comprehensive implementation completion status documentation
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
6c77fa7
Phase 1-3 Complete: Non-Blocking SystemManager with Async Recovery
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
62a6b28
Workspace cleanup: Consolidate documentation
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
446d434
Comprehensive workspace cleanup
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
2dc689f
Improve .gitignore configuration for ESP32 Audio Streamer project
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
c16e303
Add comprehensive implementation summary document
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
6720905
Remove outdated documentation files: TECHNICAL_REFERENCE.md and IMPLE…
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
5ea9917
Update WiFi and network configurations; adjust memory pool sizes for …
sarpel Oct 21, 2025
0955a89
Update WiFi configuration and logger settings; enhance system resilie…
sarpel Oct 22, 2025
ece13e0
Refactor EchoCancellation for improved performance and clarity
sarpel Oct 23, 2025
8250c5a
Refactor project structure and improve code quality
sarpel Nov 1, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
23 changes: 23 additions & 0 deletions .claude/commands/openspec/apply.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
---
name: OpenSpec: Apply
description: Implement an approved OpenSpec change and keep tasks in sync.
category: OpenSpec
tags: [openspec, apply]
---
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
**Guardrails**
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.

**Steps**
Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.
1. Read `changes/<id>/proposal.md`, `design.md` (if present), and `tasks.md` to confirm scope and acceptance criteria.
2. Work through tasks sequentially, keeping edits minimal and focused on the requested change.
3. Confirm completion before updating statuses—make sure every item in `tasks.md` is finished.
4. Update the checklist after all work is done so each task is marked `- [x]` and reflects reality.
5. Reference `openspec list` or `openspec show <item>` when additional context is required.

**Reference**
- Use `openspec show <id> --json --deltas-only` if you need additional context from the proposal while implementing.
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions .claude/commands/openspec/archive.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
---
name: OpenSpec: Archive
description: Archive a deployed OpenSpec change and update specs.
category: OpenSpec
tags: [openspec, archive]
---
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
**Guardrails**
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.

**Steps**
1. Identify the requested change ID (via the prompt or `openspec list`).
2. Run `openspec archive <id> --yes` to let the CLI move the change and apply spec updates without prompts (use `--skip-specs` only for tooling-only work).
3. Review the command output to confirm the target specs were updated and the change landed in `changes/archive/`.
4. Validate with `openspec validate --strict` and inspect with `openspec show <id>` if anything looks off.

**Reference**
- Inspect refreshed specs with `openspec list --specs` and address any validation issues before handing off.
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
27 changes: 27 additions & 0 deletions .claude/commands/openspec/proposal.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
---
name: OpenSpec: Proposal
description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.
category: OpenSpec
tags: [openspec, change]
---
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
**Guardrails**
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
- Identify any vague or ambiguous details and ask the necessary follow-up questions before editing files.

**Steps**
1. Review `openspec/project.md`, run `openspec list` and `openspec list --specs`, and inspect related code or docs (e.g., via `rg`/`ls`) to ground the proposal in current behaviour; note any gaps that require clarification.
2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and `design.md` (when needed) under `openspec/changes/<id>/`.
3. Map the change into concrete capabilities or requirements, breaking multi-scope efforts into distinct spec deltas with clear relationships and sequencing.
4. Capture architectural reasoning in `design.md` when the solution spans multiple systems, introduces new patterns, or demands trade-off discussion before committing to specs.
5. Draft spec deltas in `changes/<id>/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (one folder per capability) using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement and cross-reference related capabilities when relevant.
6. Draft `tasks.md` as an ordered list of small, verifiable work items that deliver user-visible progress, include validation (tests, tooling), and highlight dependencies or parallelizable work.
7. Validate with `openspec validate <id> --strict` and resolve every issue before sharing the proposal.

**Reference**
- Use `openspec show <id> --json --deltas-only` or `openspec show <spec> --type spec` to inspect details when validation fails.
- Search existing requirements with `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs` before writing new ones.
- Explore the codebase with `rg <keyword>`, `ls`, or direct file reads so proposals align with current implementation realities.
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions .github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
---
description: Implement an approved OpenSpec change and keep tasks in sync.
---

$ARGUMENTS
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
**Guardrails**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Markdown başlıkları için doğru sözdizimi kullan

Merhaba! Burada küçük bir biçimlendirme sorunu var. Bölüm adlarını yazmak istediğinde, **kalın metin** yerine ## işaretini kullanmak daha iyidir. Bu, bir rehber belge olduğu için okurların başlıkları daha kolay görmesine yardımcı olur — tıpkı bir kitapta başlıkların farklı fontla yazılması gibi.

Şu satırları düzeltmen gerekir:

  • Satır 7: **Guardrails**
  • Satır 12: **Steps**
  • Satır 20: **Reference**

Hepsi başlık olmalıdır (başlık kullan, vurgu değil):

-**Guardrails**
+## Guardrails

-**Steps**
+## Steps

-**Reference**
+## Reference

Also applies to: 12-12, 20-20

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

7-7: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/prompts/openspec-apply.prompt.md around lines 7, 12 and 20, the
section titles are formatted with bold syntax (e.g. `**Guardrails**`) instead of
Markdown headings; replace those bolded lines with proper heading syntax (e.g.
change `**Guardrails**` to `## Guardrails`, `**Steps**` to `## Steps`, and
`**Reference**` to `## Reference`) so they render as section headings.

- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.

**Steps**
Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one.
1. Read `changes/<id>/proposal.md`, `design.md` (if present), and `tasks.md` to confirm scope and acceptance criteria.
2. Work through tasks sequentially, keeping edits minimal and focused on the requested change.
3. Confirm completion before updating statuses—make sure every item in `tasks.md` is finished.
4. Update the checklist after all work is done so each task is marked `- [x]` and reflects reality.
5. Reference `openspec list` or `openspec show <item>` when additional context is required.

**Reference**
- Use `openspec show <id> --json --deltas-only` if you need additional context from the proposal while implementing.
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions .github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
---
description: Archive a deployed OpenSpec change and update specs.
---

$ARGUMENTS
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
**Guardrails**
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.

**Steps**
1. Identify the requested change ID (via the prompt or `openspec list`).
2. Run `openspec archive <id> --yes` to let the CLI move the change and apply spec updates without prompts (use `--skip-specs` only for tooling-only work).
3. Review the command output to confirm the target specs were updated and the change landed in `changes/archive/`.
4. Validate with `openspec validate --strict` and inspect with `openspec show <id>` if anything looks off.

**Reference**
- Inspect refreshed specs with `openspec list --specs` and address any validation issues before handing off.
Comment on lines +7 to +19
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Markdown başlıkları kullan, kalın metni değil.

Görüyorum ki **Guardrails**, **Steps** ve **Reference** bölümleri kalın metinle yazılmış. Bir ilkokul öğretmeni gibi açıklayacak olursam: Markdown'da bölüm başlıkları için # işareti kullanırız. **kalın** işareti ise metni vurgula demek anlamına gelir. Bunlar farklı şeyler için tasarlanmış!

Kalın metni gerçek başlık markdown'ına çevirirsen, belgeleme daha düzenli görünür ve arama araçları daha iyi çalışır.

Aşağıdaki değişikliği yap:

-**Guardrails**
+## Guardrails

-**Steps**
+## Steps

-**Reference**
+## Reference
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
**Guardrails**
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
**Steps**
1. Identify the requested change ID (via the prompt or `openspec list`).
2. Run `openspec archive <id> --yes` to let the CLI move the change and apply spec updates without prompts (use `--skip-specs` only for tooling-only work).
3. Review the command output to confirm the target specs were updated and the change landed in `changes/archive/`.
4. Validate with `openspec validate --strict` and inspect with `openspec show <id>` if anything looks off.
**Reference**
- Inspect refreshed specs with `openspec list --specs` and address any validation issues before handing off.
## Guardrails
- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
## Steps
1. Identify the requested change ID (via the prompt or `openspec list`).
2. Run `openspec archive <id> --yes` to let the CLI move the change and apply spec updates without prompts (use `--skip-specs` only for tooling-only work).
3. Review the command output to confirm the target specs were updated and the change landed in `changes/archive/`.
4. Validate with `openspec validate --strict` and inspect with `openspec show <id>` if anything looks off.
## Reference
- Inspect refreshed specs with `openspec list --specs` and address any validation issues before handing off.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

7-7: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


12-12: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


18-18: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/prompts/openspec-archive.prompt.md lines 7-19: the sections currently
use bold markdown for headings (**Guardrails**, **Steps**, **Reference**) but
should be real Markdown headings; replace each bolded section title with an
appropriate heading (e.g., `## Guardrails`, `## Steps`, `## Reference`) keeping
the existing content under each heading and preserving list formatting and
spacing so documentation and searchability improve.

<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
26 changes: 26 additions & 0 deletions .github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
---
description: Scaffold a new OpenSpec change and validate strictly.
---

$ARGUMENTS
<!-- OPENSPEC:START -->
**Guardrails**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Markdown başlıklar yerine vurgulamayı düzelt

Bu satırlardaki kalın metin (**...**) aslında başlık (##) olarak yazılmalı. Bunu şöyle düşün: Eğer bir bölümün başında "Bu kısım çok önemli!" diye söylüyorsan, bunu kalın harfle yazmak yerine onu gözle görmesi kolay bir başlık haline getirmeliyiz. Markdown'da bu, 'hash' işaretleri (##) kullanmakla olur.

Düzeltme yapması gereken satırlar:

  • Satır 7: **Guardrails**## Guardrails
  • Satır 13: **Steps**## Steps
  • Satır 22: **Reference**## Reference

Düzeltilmiş versiyon:

- **Guardrails**
+ ## Guardrails

- **Steps**
+ ## Steps

- **Reference**
+ ## Reference

Also applies to: 13-13, 22-22

🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

7-7: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/prompts/openspec-proposal.prompt.md around lines 7, 13 and 22: the
review points out that bolded section titles were used instead of Markdown
headings; replace the bold markers (`**Guardrails**`, `**Steps**`,
`**Reference**`) with level-2 headings (`## Guardrails`, `## Steps`, `##
Reference`) on lines 7, 13 and 22 respectively, and ensure surrounding
spacing/newlines match typical Markdown heading formatting so they render as
section headers.

- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required.
- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome.
- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications.
- Identify any vague or ambiguous details and ask the necessary follow-up questions before editing files.

**Steps**
1. Review `openspec/project.md`, run `openspec list` and `openspec list --specs`, and inspect related code or docs (e.g., via `rg`/`ls`) to ground the proposal in current behaviour; note any gaps that require clarification.
2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and `design.md` (when needed) under `openspec/changes/<id>/`.
3. Map the change into concrete capabilities or requirements, breaking multi-scope efforts into distinct spec deltas with clear relationships and sequencing.
4. Capture architectural reasoning in `design.md` when the solution spans multiple systems, introduces new patterns, or demands trade-off discussion before committing to specs.
5. Draft spec deltas in `changes/<id>/specs/<capability>/spec.md` (one folder per capability) using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement and cross-reference related capabilities when relevant.
6. Draft `tasks.md` as an ordered list of small, verifiable work items that deliver user-visible progress, include validation (tests, tooling), and highlight dependencies or parallelizable work.
7. Validate with `openspec validate <id> --strict` and resolve every issue before sharing the proposal.

**Reference**
- Use `openspec show <id> --json --deltas-only` or `openspec show <spec> --type spec` to inspect details when validation fails.
- Search existing requirements with `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs` before writing new ones.
- Explore the codebase with `rg <keyword>`, `ls`, or direct file reads so proposals align with current implementation realities.
<!-- OPENSPEC:END -->
107 changes: 107 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/ci-build.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
name: CI Build and Test

on:
push:
branches: [ main, develop ]
pull_request:
branches: [ main, develop ]

jobs:
build:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

GitHub Actions sürümleri güncellenmelidir (çok önemli!).

Bak, GitHub Actions'taki bu araçlar (actions) kültüren birer oyuncak gibi. Eski oyuncaklar artık iyi çalışmıyor çünkü GitHub yeni kurallar getirdi. Sen yeni versiyonlara güncellemeniz gerekiyor:

  • checkout@v3checkout@v4
  • setup-python@v4setup-python@v5
  • upload-artifact@v3upload-artifact@v4

Bu eski versiyonlar zamanla destek kaybedecek ve iş yapamayacaklar.

Güncelleme için:

  - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4

Bütün checkout, setup-python ve upload-artifact adımlarında aynısını yap.

Also applies to: 17-17, 40-40, 49-49, 52-52, 72-72, 75-75, 92-92


[/web_search]

[/run_scripts]


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the workflow file to see actual versions used
cat .github/workflows/ci-build.yml | grep -n "uses: actions/"

Length of output: 298


🌐 Web query:

GitHub Actions actions/checkout latest version 2024 2025

💡 Result:

The current/latest major release is actions/checkout@v5. [1][2]

Notes: v5 updates the action to Node 24 and requires Actions Runner >= v2.327.1. [1]

Sources:
[1] actions/checkout (GitHub repo README).
[2] actions/checkout (GitHub Marketplace).


🌐 Web query:

GitHub Actions actions/setup-python latest version 2024 2025

💡 Result:

Latest is actions/setup-python v6 — the repository release v6.0.0 (see releases). [1][2]

Sources:
[1] actions/setup-python releases (v6.0.0). [2] actions/setup-python README / Marketplace (shows usage with @v6).


🌐 Web query:

GitHub Actions actions/upload-artifact latest version 2024 2025

💡 Result:

Latest stable major version: v4 — use actions/upload-artifact@v4. The most recent release is v4.6.2 (published Mar 19, 2025). [1][2]

Sources:

  • release list (v4.6.2). [1]
  • GitHub changelog / deprecation notice recommending v4. [2]

🌐 Web query:

GitHub Actions v3 v4 v5 deprecation end of support timeline

💡 Result:

Summary timeline (sources):

  • Node 16 deprecation (GitHub Actions): announced Sept 22, 2023 — GitHub asked maintainers to move actions to Node.js 20 (transition targeted by Spring 2024). [1]

  • actions/upload-artifact / download-artifact:

    • v1/v2 scheduled for deprecation Jun 30, 2024; v3 scheduled for deprecation Nov 30, 2024 (repo/Marketplace notices). [2][3]
    • GitHub/Pages-related notice / community discussion: by Jan 30, 2025 v3 of the artifact actions will no longer be usable on github.com (brownouts/breaks were announced ahead of that date). [4][5]
  • actions/cache: older runtime versions were deprecated in advance of the new cache service rollout; the new cache service and deprecation/stop-of-legacy service was scheduled for Feb 1, 2025 (repos/release notes recommend upgrading to actions/cache v3+ or v4 before Feb 1, 2025). [6]

Sources:

  1. GitHub changelog — "Transitioning from Node 16 to Node 20" (2023‑09‑22). [https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20] [1]
  2. actions/upload-artifact repository / Marketplace warnings (v1/v2/v3 deprecation schedule). [https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact] [2]
  3. Marketplace / upload-artifact deprecation note (v3 scheduled Nov 30 2024; v1/v2 June 30 2024). [Marketplace listing]. [3]
  4. GitHub changelog — "Deprecation notice: GitHub Pages actions to require artifacts actions v4 on GitHub.com" (announces Jan 30, 2025 enforcement for Pages workflows). [https://github.blog/changelog/2024-12-05-deprecation-notice-github-pages-actions-to-require-artifacts-actions-v4-on-github-com/] [4]
  5. GitHub community discussion — "Deprecation Notice (reminder): v3 of the artifact actions" (details brownouts and Jan 30, 2025 cutoff). [https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/142581] [5]
  6. actions/cache release notes — new cache service rollout and recommendation to upgrade before Feb 1, 2025. [e.g., actions/cache releases/4.2.0 notes]. [6]

If you want, I can list which common official actions (checkout, setup-node, cache, upload/download-artifact, setup-* actions) still need bumping in your repo and produce a PR patch.



Tüm GitHub Actions araçlarını güncellemen gerekiyor — özellikle upload-artifact@v3 artık çalışmıyor!

Arkadaş, bu durum önemli. Resim git gibi düşün: senin iş araçların (actions) çok eski sürümleri kullanıyor. GitHub, Eylül 2024'te "Ey, eski araçları yenilerin!" dedi. Sen henüz yapmadın.

İşin kötü tarafı: upload-artifact@v3 30 Ocak 2025'ten beri artık hiç çalışmıyor. Bugün 23 Ekim 2025 — bu araç 9 ay önce devre dışı bırakıldı. Bu yüzden senin iş akışı bozuk olabilir.

Doğru güncellemeler şunlar:

  • checkout@v3checkout@v5 (v4 değil, v5!)
  • setup-python@v4setup-python@v6 (v5 değil, v6!)
  • upload-artifact@v3upload-artifact@v4 (acil!)

Örnek:

  - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v5

Bunu dosyanın 14., 17., 40., 49., 52., 72., 75., 92. satırlarında yap. upload-artifact@v3 özellikle hemen değiştirilmeli.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- uses: actions/checkout@v5
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)

14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml lines 14, 17, 40, 49, 52, 72, 75, 92: update
outdated GitHub Actions versions as requested — replace checkout@v3 with
checkout@v5, setup-python@v4 with setup-python@v6, and urgently replace
upload-artifact@v3 with upload-artifact@v4; apply those exact substitutions at
the specified line numbers (ensure no other action versions are altered) and run
a quick local lint/validate of the workflow YAML after changes.


- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: '3.9'

- name: Install PlatformIO
run: pip install -U platformio

- name: Build ESP32 firmware
run: platformio run

- name: Run unit tests
run: platformio test -e test_unit
continue-on-error: true

- name: Run integration tests
run: platformio test -e test_integration
continue-on-error: true

- name: Run static analysis
run: platformio check
continue-on-error: true
Comment on lines +27 to +37
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Test ve analiz adımları hataları gizliyor - bu tehlikeli!

Bak, tıpkı bir sınıfta "Hata yaptıysan söyleme, devam et" demek gibi - bu kötü fikir! continue-on-error: true kullanıldığında yapı başarılı görünüyor ama aslında testler patlamış olabilir:

  • Line 29: Unit testleri başarısız olabilir → gizlenir ✗
  • Line 33: Entegrasyon testleri başarısız olabilir → gizlenir ✗
  • Line 37: Statik analiz sorunları → gizlenir ✗

Bu çok tehlikeli! Hatalar bulunmuş olsa bile kimse görmeyecek.

Önerim:

  • Gerçekten kırılabilecek testler midir? Evet ise continue-on-error kaldır
  • Sadece uyarı istemişler midir? Evet ise o zaman tamam, ama kodu revize et böylece testler başarısız olmazsa düşün
  - name: Run unit tests
-   run: platformio test -e test_unit
-   continue-on-error: true
+   run: platformio test -e test_unit

  - name: Run integration tests
-   run: platformio test -e test_integration
-   continue-on-error: true
+   run: platformio test -e test_integration

  - name: Run static analysis
-   run: platformio check
-   continue-on-error: true
+   run: platformio check

Anlayabilmek için web araştırması yapmam gerekiyor. Özellikle GitHub Actions'un continue-on-error ayarının tam olarak ne yaptığını ve bunun en iyi uygulamalar açısından uygun olup olmadığını kontrol edeceğim.

[/web_search]


🌐 Web query:

GitHub Actions continue-on-error best practices

💡 Result:

Short best-practices for using continue-on-error in GitHub Actions

  1. Use the smallest scope possible — prefer step-level continue-on-error for non‑critical actions (uploading artifacts, flaky tests), and job-level only when the entire job is “allowed to fail.” [1][2]

  2. Don’t hide important failures — mark only truly non‑blocking work as continue-on-error and surface failures elsewhere (PR comments, status checks, artifacts). Consider actions that post a PR comment when an allowed-failure actually fails. [3][4]

  3. Combine with matrix controls — for matrix runs use continue-on-error with strategy.fail-fast: false (or matrix-specific expressions) so an “allowed” matrix leg can fail without cancelling other legs. Use expressions to target specific matrix entries. [1][2]

  4. Make downstream logic explicit — if later steps or jobs must run regardless of a previous allowed failure, use explicit if: expressions (success() || failure()) or job outputs rather than relying on implicit behavior. Beware known interactions/edge cases between continue-on-error and status functions. [2][5]

  5. Record evidence for failures — always upload logs/artifacts and set meaningful annotations when a step/job is allowed to fail so triage is possible after the fact. [1][3]

  6. Treat allowed failures as technical debt — track flaky/experimental failures in an issue or dashboard and remove continue-on-error once the underlying problem is fixed.

References

  • GitHub Actions docs: running variations of jobs, continue-on-error and fail-fast usage. [1]
  • GitHub docs / workflow syntax examples and guidance for job/step continue-on-error. [2]
  • Marketplace “continue-on-error comment” action (example pattern for surfacing allowed failures). [3]
  • Known bug/discussion about interactions of continue-on-error with failure()/status functions. [5]

If you want, I can convert these into ready-to-drop workflow snippets (step-level, job-level, matrix) for your repo.


Daha fazla bilgi toplamam gerekiyor. Workflow dosyasını ve bunun arkasındaki nedenleri kontrol edeceğim.

[/run_scripts]


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the workflow file and surrounding context
cat .github/workflows/ci-build.yml

# Look for any issue references or comments
grep -r "continue-on-error\|flaky\|TODO\|FIXME" .github/ --include="*.yml" --include="*.yaml" -i

Length of output: 3288


Test ve analiz adımlarından continue-on-error: true kaldırılmalı - bu kritik bir sorun

Öğretmen gibi anlatayım: Düşün ki sınıfta öğrenciler sınav yapıyor. Eğer "Hata yaptıysan söyleme, başarılı sayılırsın" dersek, başarısızlıklar görünmez kalır ama gerçekten sorun vardır.

GitHub Actions'ta continue-on-error: true tam bunu yapıyor - adımlar başarısız olsa bile iş başarılı görünüyor:

  • 29. satır (Unit testler): Kodda hata olsa bile gizlenir ✗
  • 33. satır (Entegrasyon testleri): Parçalar çalışmasa bile fark edilmez ✗
  • 37. satır (Statik analiz): Kod kalitesi sorunları gözardı edilir ✗

En iyi uygulamalara göre, önemli kontroller (testler, analiz) asla devam etmemeliler. Bu bayraklar yalnızca "çok önemli değil" işleri için kullanılır.

  - name: Run unit tests
    run: platformio test -e test_unit
-   continue-on-error: true
  
  - name: Run integration tests
    run: platformio test -e test_integration
-   continue-on-error: true
  
  - name: Run static analysis
    run: platformio check
-   continue-on-error: true
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/ci-build.yml around lines 27 to 37 the three steps "Run
unit tests", "Run integration tests" and "Run static analysis" are marked with
continue-on-error: true which hides failures; remove the continue-on-error: true
keys from those steps so the workflow will fail on test or analysis failures,
ensuring CI reports errors correctly, and commit the updated workflow.


- name: Generate firmware artifact
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: firmware
path: .pio/build/*/firmware.bin

code-quality:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3

- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: '3.9'

- name: Install dependencies
run: |
pip install pylint cppcheck

- name: Run Cppcheck
run: cppcheck --enable=all --suppress=missingIncludeSystem src/
continue-on-error: true

- name: Check code formatting
run: find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs clang-format --dry-run --Werror
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Dosya isimlerinde özel karakterler sorun yaratabilir (güvenlik problemi).

Şu find ... | xargs komutları tıpkı birbirinden ayrılmış oyuncakları tuttmaya çalışmak gibi - boşluk veya tırnak işareti olan dosya isimlerinde kırılıyor. Bu güvenlik açığı olabilir!

Komutları şöyle değiştir (çocuklara uygun deyişle: oyuncakları düzgün paketleyerek gönder):

  # Line 65:
- - name: Check code formatting
-   run: find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs clang-format --dry-run --Werror
+ - name: Check code formatting
+   run: find src \( -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" \) -print0 | xargs -0 clang-format --dry-run --Werror

  # Line 97:
- - name: Run security checks
-   run: |
-     pip install bandit
-     find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs bandit
+ - name: Run security checks
+   run: |
+     pip install bandit
+     find src \( -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" \) -print0 | xargs -0 bandit

Also applies to: 97-97


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the workflow file exists and examine lines around 65 and 97
if [ -f .github/workflows/ci-build.yml ]; then
  echo "=== File exists, checking line 65 context ==="
  sed -n '60,70p' .github/workflows/ci-build.yml
  echo ""
  echo "=== Checking line 97 context ==="
  sed -n '92,102p' .github/workflows/ci-build.yml
else
  echo "File not found"
fi

Length of output: 696


🌐 Web query:

find xargs -print0 security filenames spaces special characters

💡 Result:

Short answer

  • Use null-terminated names: find ... -print0 | xargs -0 ... to safely handle filenames with spaces, newlines, and other special characters. [1][3]

Why

  • By default xargs splits on whitespace (and interprets quotes/trailing whitespace), which can mangle filenames with spaces/newlines. The -0/--null option tells xargs to treat NUL (ASCII 0) as the separator; -print0 makes find emit NULs. This is the recommended safe pattern. [1][3]

Security notes / best practices

  • Prefer find -print0 | xargs -0 or find -exec … + (or -execdir) instead of plain find | xargs to avoid unexpected splitting and injection-like problems. [2]
  • Use --no-run-if-empty (or -r) where available to avoid running commands with empty input.
  • When running dangerous commands (rm, mv, chmod, etc.) preview with xargs -t or run a dry-run first (e.g., replace rm with echo). [2][3]

Examples

  • Remove .tmp files safely:
    find . -type f -name '*.tmp' -print0 | xargs -0 rm --
  • Run sha256sum in parallel on matched files:
    find /path -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -n5 -P3 sha256sum
  • Move files using placeholder:
    find . -name "*.txt" -print0 | xargs -0 -I {} mv -- "{}" /dest/

References
[1] GNU Findutils — Safe File Name Handling.
[2] GNU Findutils — Security considerations for xargs.
[3] xargs manual/usage guides and examples (docs/tutorials).


Dosya adlarındaki boşluk ve özel karakterler için find | xargs güvenlik sorunu doğrulandı.

Meslek öğretmenin gibi anlatayım: Şöyle düşün — çocuklara oyuncaklarını gönderse, birbirlerine yapıştırarak göndersek, kimse hangisinin kime ait olduğunu anlayamaz, değil mi? find ile xargs de aynı — boşluk olan dosya isimlerinde birbirini karıştırıyor. Bu, gerçek bir sorun!

Doğru yol, oyuncakları özel ambalajla göndermek gibi: -print0 (sıfırla ayıraç) kullanarak. İşte düzeltme:

  # Line 65:
- - name: Check code formatting
-   run: find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs clang-format --dry-run --Werror
+ - name: Check code formatting
+   run: find src \( -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" \) -print0 | xargs -0 clang-format --dry-run --Werror

  # Line 97:
- - name: Run security checks
-   run: |
-     pip install bandit
-     find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs bandit
+ - name: Run security checks
+   run: |
+     pip install bandit
+     find src \( -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" \) -print0 | xargs -0 bandit

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)

65-65: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2038:warning:1:1: Use 'find .. -print0 | xargs -0 ..' or 'find .. -exec .. +' to allow non-alphanumeric filenames

(shellcheck)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/ci-build.yml at line 65, the use of `find ... | xargs
clang-format ...` is unsafe for filenames with spaces or special characters;
change the pipeline to use a null-separated approach by having find emit NULs
(e.g., -print0) and pass them to xargs with the -0 flag, or alternatively use
find -exec ... {} + so filenames are handled safely; update the workflow command
accordingly to ensure clang-format receives correct, safely-delimited paths.

continue-on-error: true
Comment on lines +60 to +66
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Kod formatlaması hataları gizleniyor.

clang-format --dry-run --Werror komutu formatlaması yanlış kodları bulacak, ama continue-on-error: true (line 66) bu hataları gizliyor.

Eğer kod formatlaması önemliyse (ve önemli!), bu hatalar ileride daha büyük problemlere yol açabilir.

  - name: Check code formatting
-   run: find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs clang-format --dry-run --Werror
-   continue-on-error: true
+   run: find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs clang-format --dry-run --Werror
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)

65-65: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2038:warning:1:1: Use 'find .. -print0 | xargs -0 ..' or 'find .. -exec .. +' to allow non-alphanumeric filenames

(shellcheck)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml around lines 60 to 66: the "Check code
formatting" step runs clang-format with --dry-run --Werror but is masked by
continue-on-error: true; remove the continue-on-error line (or set it to false)
for that step so the workflow fails when formatting violations are detected,
ensuring CI enforces code style; optionally, if you want auto-fix behavior,
replace the dry-run with a non-dry run in a separate job or add a formatting
step that runs clang-format -i and commits changes, but do not leave the lint
step with continue-on-error enabled.


memory-check:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3

- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: '3.9'

- name: Install PlatformIO
run: pip install -U platformio

- name: Build and check memory usage
run: |
platformio run --environment esp32-dev
python3 scripts/memory_check.py
continue-on-error: true

security-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3

- name: Run security checks
run: |
pip install bandit
find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs bandit
continue-on-error: true
Comment on lines +88 to +98
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Güvenlik taraması hataları görmezden gelinebiliyor.

bandit (güvenlik taraması aracı) güvenlik sorunlarını bulur, ama continue-on-error: true (line 98) bu hataları gizliyor. Bu çok riskli!

Güvenlik sorunları katı olmalı - hiçbir zaman gizlenmemeli.

  - name: Run security checks
    run: |
      pip install bandit
      find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs bandit
-   continue-on-error: true
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
security-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Run security checks
run: |
pip install bandit
find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs bandit
continue-on-error: true
security-scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Run security checks
run: |
pip install bandit
find src -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" | xargs bandit
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)

92-92: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


95-95: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2038:warning:2:1: Use 'find .. -print0 | xargs -0 ..' or 'find .. -exec .. +' to allow non-alphanumeric filenames

(shellcheck)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml lines 88-98: the security-scan job currently sets
continue-on-error: true which hides Bandit failures; change this to fail the
workflow by removing the continue-on-error setting or setting it to false, and
also adjust the Bandit invocation to target Python files (e.g. run bandit
against *.py under src) so the scan is meaningful; ensure the step exits
non-zero on findings so security issues block the CI.


notify:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: [build, code-quality, memory-check]
if: always()
Comment on lines +100 to +103
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

notify işi eksik bağlantıya sahip.

Bak, notify işi (job) sadece build, code-quality ve memory-check'e bağlı. Ama güvenlik-scan'i (security-scan) beklemiyor!

Eğer güvenlik taraması başarısız olsa da, notify yine çalışacak ve bunu "tamamlandı" diye ilan edecek. Bu yanıltıcı!

  notify:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-   needs: [build, code-quality, memory-check]
+   needs: [build, code-quality, memory-check, security-scan]
    if: always()
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
notify:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: [build, code-quality, memory-check]
if: always()
notify:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: [build, code-quality, memory-check, security-scan]
if: always()
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml around lines 100-103: the notify job is currently
dependent on build, code-quality, and memory-check but not security-scan, so it
can run even when the security-scan fails; update the job dependencies to
include security-scan in the needs list (e.g., add "security-scan" alongside the
existing jobs) so notify waits for the security scan to complete before running.


steps:
- name: Notify build completion
run: echo "CI pipeline completed"
69 changes: 69 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/performance-test.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
name: Performance Testing

on:
schedule:
- cron: '0 2 * * *'
workflow_dispatch:

jobs:
performance-test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

❓ Verification inconclusive

GitHub Actions sürümlerini güncelle — daha güvenli versiyonlar var.

Sevgili, bu workflow'da kullanılan actions/checkout, actions/setup-python ve actions/upload-artifact araçları eski versiyonlar. Bunu şöyle düşün: tıpkı telefonunun yazılımını (güncelleme) yapmaman gerektiğine yönelik bildirimleri nasıl alıyorsan, GitHub Actions da böyle. Eski versiyonlar güvenlik sorunlarına ve hatalara açık. En son versiyonlara yükseltmelisin.

Önerilen değişiklikler:

  • actions/checkout@v3actions/checkout@v4
  • actions/setup-python@v4actions/setup-python@v5
  • actions/upload-artifact@v3actions/upload-artifact@v4
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-python@v4
+ uses: actions/setup-python@v5
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4

Also applies to: 16-16, 35-35, 44-44, 47-47, 66-66


Devam etmeden önce, review comment'teki sürüm önerilerini doğrulamalıyım. Web'de güncel bilgi araştırayım:

GitHub Actions araçlarını güncelleştir — En güncel versiyonlara geç.

Bu workflow'daki action versiyonları güncel değil. Bunu tıpkı bu şekilde düşün: Eğer telefonunun yazılımı eski kalırsa, yeni özellikler alamazsın ve güvenlik sorunları ortaya çıkar. GitHub Actions da aynı şekilde çalışır.

actions/checkout en son v5.0.0 versiyonunda ve actions/setup-python en son v6'da. actions/upload-artifact@v3 ise 30 Ocak 2025'ten itibaren kullanılamayacak, v4'e güncellemek gerekiyor.

Ayrıca, Python 3.9 Ekim 2025'te hayat döngüsünün sonuna ulaşıyor — bu tarih bugün (23 Ekim 2025) geçmiş durumda. Python Software Foundation Ekim 2025'ten sonra Python 3.9 için güvenlik yamaları sağlamayacak.

Önerilen değişiklikler:

  • actions/checkout@v3actions/checkout@v5
  • actions/setup-python@v4actions/setup-python@v6
  • actions/upload-artifact@v3actions/upload-artifact@v4
  • Python sürümünü 3.9'dan 3.10 veya daha yenisine yükselt

Hatırlayın: Güncel tutmak, güvenliğin anahtarıdır!

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)

13-13: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/performance-test.yml around line 13: the workflow pins
outdated action versions and an EOL Python; update actions/checkout@v3 ->
actions/checkout@v5, actions/setup-python@v4 -> actions/setup-python@v6,
actions/upload-artifact@v3 -> actions/upload-artifact@v4, and bump the workflow
Python runner from 3.9 to a supported version (3.10 or newer); ensure the three
action usages and the python-version matrix/field are replaced with the new tags
and adjust any inputs if v6/v5/v4 introduced breaking changes.


- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: '3.9'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Python 3.9 çok eski — 3.11 veya 3.12'ye yükselt.

Biliyorsun, Python 3.9 Ekim 2025'te (tam şimdi!) desteği sona erdi. Bunu şöyle düşün: kütüphanenin sayfasından bir kitabı almayı denedin ama "bu kitap artık yok, yenisini alalım" dediler. Python 3.11 veya 3.12 kullanman daha iyi olur — daha hızlı, daha güvenli ve daha güncel.

- python-version: '3.9'
+ python-version: '3.12'

Also applies to: 49-49

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/performance-test.yml around lines 18 and 49, the workflow
pins python-version to '3.9' which is EOL; update both occurrences to a
supported version such as '3.11' or '3.12' (pick one consistently across the
file), ensuring any matrix or steps that depend on the Python version are
compatible and run tests/actions after the change.


- name: Install PlatformIO
run: pip install -U platformio

- name: Build performance test firmware
run: platformio run -e test_performance

- name: Run performance benchmarks
run: platformio test -e test_performance -v
continue-on-error: true
Comment on lines +27 to +28
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

continue-on-error: true hataları gizleyebilir — biraz tehlikeli olabilir.

Biliyorsun, bu şey "test başarısız olsa bile workflow'ya devam et" anlamına geliyor. Bunu şöyle düşün: matematik ödevinde hata yaptığında öğretmen sana bunu söylemez, sadece kırmızı kalem işareti koyar ve geçer. Burada sorun şu: eğer testler başarısız olursa, workflow başarılı görünür, ama aslında bir sorun var! İnsanlar "Heh, test geçti!" derler, ama gerçek hata gizlendi.

Daha iyi bir yaklaşım:

  • Önemli test başarısızlıklarında workflow başarısız olmalı
  • Rapor oluşturma başarısız olursa, bunu not et ama workflow'ya devam et

Önerim: En az rapor oluşturma adımlarını daha sıkı hale getir. Test adımlarında continue-on-error: true bırakabilirsin, ama sonra hataları LOG'la.

- name: Run performance benchmarks
  run: platformio test -e test_performance -v
  continue-on-error: true

- name: Generate performance report
  run: python3 scripts/generate_performance_report.py
  # continue-on-error'u kaldır, başarısız olmalı!

Also applies to: 31-32, 57-59, 61-63

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/performance-test.yml around lines 27-28 (and also review
lines 31-32, 57-59, 61-63): the workflow currently uses continue-on-error: true
for steps that hide failures; change it so that performance report generation
and other critical steps do not use continue-on-error (remove the flag) so the
workflow fails on real errors, while test execution may keep continue-on-error
if desired but must capture and log non-zero exit codes (e.g., save the test
exit status to a file or environment variable and explicitly echo/log it and
fail later if thresholds exceeded); ensure report-generation steps are strict
(no continue-on-error) and add a final validation step that inspects previously
recorded test/report statuses and fails the job if critical failures were
recorded.


- name: Generate performance report
run: python3 scripts/generate_performance_report.py
continue-on-error: true

- name: Upload performance report
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: performance-report
path: reports/performance_*.html
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Dosya glob desenleri başarısız olabilir — reports/ klasörünün varlığını kontrol et.

Burada reports/performance_*.html ve reports/stress_*.html kullanıyorsun. Bunu şöyle düşün: sen cümle başında "Ey bilgisayar, o masada *.html dosyalarını bul" diyorsun, ama masanın kendisi var mı? Eğer reports/ klasörü yok veya script HTML dosyası oluşturmazsa, bu adımlar sessizce başarısız olabilir.

Önerilen çözüm: İş öncesinde klasörü oluştur:

- name: Create reports directory
  run: mkdir -p reports

Also applies to: 69-69

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/performance-test.yml around lines 38 and 69 the artifact
file glob paths (reports/performance_*.html and reports/stress_*.html) can
silently fail if the reports/ directory does not exist; add a workflow step
before the artifact upload/usage steps that creates the directory (e.g., run
mkdir -p reports) so the glob has a target directory and the actions won't fail
silently.


stress-test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3

- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v4
with:
python-version: '3.9'

- name: Install PlatformIO
run: pip install -U platformio

- name: Build stress test firmware
run: platformio run -e test_stress

- name: Run stress tests
run: platformio test -e test_stress -v
continue-on-error: true

- name: Generate stress test report
run: python3 scripts/generate_stress_report.py
continue-on-error: true

- name: Upload stress test report
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: stress-test-report
path: reports/stress_*.html
Loading