- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 8
 
Upgrade to scalajs 1.7 #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
587e085    to
    a49232b      
    Compare
  
    There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only minor stuff.
        
          
                .github/workflows/ci.yml
              
                Outdated
          
        
      | scalaversion: ["2.11.12", "2.12.10", "2.13.1"] | ||
| scalajsversion: ["1.5.0"] | ||
| scalaversion: ["2.11.12", "2.12.15", "2.13.6"] | ||
| scalajsversion: ["1.7.0", "1.7.1"] | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do not quite understand how this is supposed to work: Won't we publish the CLI for a single Scala.js version only anyways? If so, what's the point of testing with an older one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right. It's pointless.
        
          
                project/build.properties
              
                Outdated
          
        
      | @@ -1 +1 @@ | |||
| sbt.version=1.2.8 | |||
| sbt.version=1.5.5 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Put the sbt version upgrade into a separate commit to reduce noise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
| 
           @clutroth thank you for your contributions to the CLI. I realize we have not even tagged a release after your last PR. Apologies for that. @sjrd, I suggest we simply start releasing on its own versioning scheme? maybe with minor version bumps if we upgrade the minor Scala.js version? Definitely not the cleanest option, but better than not releasing at all :-/ WDYT?  | 
    
| 
           Yes, probably that's what we should do. Ideally I think we should explore something using   | 
    
a49232b    to
    c9a6f01      
    Compare
  
    | 
           Glad to help :) I'd appreciate release.  | 
    
No description provided.