-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Fix to specify schema when creating or dropping an index with Db2 engine #2922
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @KodaiD, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request resolves a critical issue in the Db2 engine integration where index creation and deletion operations were failing due to the omission of schema names in the generated SQL. By ensuring that all CREATE INDEX and DROP INDEX statements for Db2 explicitly include the schema, the PR enhances the robustness and correctness of database administration operations for Db2 users, mirroring a similar fix previously applied for Oracle.
Highlights
- Db2 Index Management Fix: This PR addresses a bug in the Db2 engine integration where
DROP INDEXoperations would fail with aNotFounderror if the index was created by another user, due to the lack of schema specification in the SQL statement. The fix ensures that bothCREATE INDEXandDROP INDEXstatements for Db2 now correctly include the schema name. - SQL Statement Generation Update: The
RdbEngineDb2class has been updated to modify thedropIndexSqlmethod and introduce a newcreateIndexSqlmethod. Both now generate SQL statements that explicitly qualify index names with their respective schemas, aligning with Db2's requirements for index management. - Test Case Adjustments: Existing test cases within
JdbcAdminTest.javarelated to Db2 index creation and dropping have been updated. The expected SQL strings in these tests now include the schema qualification for index names, reflecting the changes made to the SQL generation logic.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes an issue with DB2 index operations where schema names were not being properly specified in CREATE INDEX and DROP INDEX SQL statements. In DB2, users must specify the schema name when creating or dropping indexes that may be accessed by other users, preventing NotFound errors during index operations.
Key changes:
- Updated
RdbEngineDb2to include schema names in index creation SQL statements by overridingcreateIndexSql - Modified
dropIndexSqlinRdbEngineDb2to include schema names in DROP INDEX statements - Updated test expectations in
JdbcAdminTestto verify the new SQL format with schema-qualified index names
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
core/src/main/java/com/scalar/db/storage/jdbc/RdbEngineDb2.java |
Added schema qualification to CREATE INDEX and DROP INDEX SQL statements for DB2 |
core/src/test/java/com/scalar/db/storage/jdbc/JdbcAdminTest.java |
Updated test expectations to match new schema-qualified index SQL format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The changes address the Db2 index creation and deletion by specifying the schema. The tests have also been updated to reflect these changes, ensuring the new SQL statement format is verified.
Torch3333
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you!
Great catch! Maybe we should add a test case to reproduce this scenario? |
We can reproduce the issue in the permission test (#2923). |
Ah, sorry. I overlooked it. I think that's enough to check the behavior in the permission test. |
brfrn169
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thank you!
Should we also prepare cases for that in the normal integration test side?
I think the permission test is enough, too. Thanks!
komamitsu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 👍
feeblefakie
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thank you!
Description
In Db2, users must specify the schema name when dropping an index that was created by another user.
However, the current implementation of
JdbcAdmindoes not do this, leading to a NotFound error when attempting to drop the index.This PR fixes the issue by specifying the schema name when creating or dropping an index in Db2.
Related issues and/or PRs
This is the similar issue to the one fixed for Oracle in #2888.
Changes made
CREATE INDEXorDROP INDEXSQL statements in Db2 engine.Checklist
Additional notes (optional)
N/A
Release notes
N/A