-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Disable the coordinator write omission in ScalarDB #203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable the coordinator write omission in ScalarDB #203
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jnmt, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a critical issue in ScalarDL's recovery process by ensuring that the 'coordinator write omission' optimization in ScalarDB is always disabled. This prevents read-only transactions from incorrectly appearing as 'aborted' due to the omission of coordinator state writes, thereby maintaining data consistency and correct recovery behavior for ScalarDL users.
Highlights
- Configuration Enforcement: I've added logic within
LedgerConfig.java
to explicitly disable thecoordinator write omission
optimization if it's found to be enabled. This is crucial for ScalarDL's recovery process, ensuring that the coordinator state is always written, even for read-only transactions. A warning message will be logged if the option is detected as enabled and subsequently disabled. - Test Coverage: I've introduced two new unit tests in
LedgerConfigTest.java
to verify the behavior of thecoordinator write omission
setting. One test confirms that the option remains disabled if explicitly configured as such, and another confirms that the new logic correctly forces the option to be disabled even if it was initially set totrue
.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR disables the coordinator write omission optimization in ScalarDB for ScalarDL to prevent read-only transactions from appearing as "aborted" when they should show as successfully committed. ScalarDL requires coordinator state information for recovery processes even for read-only transactions.
- Adds validation logic to disable coordinator write omission when enabled
- Implements warning logging when the optimization is forcibly disabled
- Adds comprehensive test coverage for both enabled and disabled scenarios
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
File | Description |
---|---|
LedgerConfig.java | Adds validation logic to disable coordinator write omission and log warning |
LedgerConfigTest.java | Adds test cases to verify proper handling of coordinator write omission settings |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)
ledger/src/main/java/com/scalar/dl/ledger/config/LedgerConfig.java:525
- [nitpick] The warning message could be clearer about what action was taken. Consider changing to '...has been disabled because...' to clearly indicate the system took action to disable it.
+ " is disabled because the Coordinator write is always necessary for ScalarDL");
ledger/src/test/java/com/scalar/dl/ledger/config/LedgerConfigTest.java:586
- [nitpick] The test method name 'constructor_ConsensusCommitWithCoordinatorWriteOmissionDisabledSpecified_ShouldConstructProperly' is very long and could be shortened to improve readability. Consider 'constructor_CoordinatorWriteOmissionDisabled_ShouldConstructProperly'.
public void
ledger/src/test/java/com/scalar/dl/ledger/config/LedgerConfigTest.java:603
- [nitpick] The test method name 'constructor_ConsensusCommitWithCoordinatorWriteOmissionEnabledSpecified_ShouldConstructProperlyWithDisablingIt' is excessively long. Consider 'constructor_CoordinatorWriteOmissionEnabled_ShouldDisableItAutomatically' for better readability.
public void
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request disables the coordinator write omission optimization to ensure the recovery process in ScalarDL functions as expected. The logic is sound, and the accompanying tests effectively validate the new behavior. The feedback focuses on enhancing the warning log message for better clarity.
ledger/src/main/java/com/scalar/dl/ledger/config/LedgerConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left just a minor suggestion. Other than that, LGTM! Thank you!🙇🏻♂️
ledger/src/main/java/com/scalar/dl/ledger/config/LedgerConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…java [skip ci] Co-authored-by: Josh Wong <joshua.wong@scalar-labs.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thank you!
Description
This PR disables the coordinator write omission optimization in ScalarDB because, in ScalarDL, we use the coordinator state for the recovery process even for read-only transactions. Without disabling it, users may see the incorrect "aborted" state for read-only transactions, even if they are successfully committed.
Related issues and/or PRs
Changes made
Checklist
Additional notes (optional)
N/A
Release notes
Disabled the coordinator write omission in ScalarDB.