Skip to content

Conversation

@DarkIsDude
Copy link
Contributor

@DarkIsDude DarkIsDude commented Sep 1, 2025

Issue: CLDSRV-736

Pull request template

Description

Motivation and context

Improve DevX

Related issues

None

@DarkIsDude DarkIsDude self-assigned this Sep 1, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 1, 2025

Hello darkisdude,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 1, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-736 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.1.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-736, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.54%. Comparing base (120c996) to head (0a69d1a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on development/9.1.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.1    #5924   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            83.54%   83.54%           
================================================
  Files                  190      190           
  Lines                12175    12175           
================================================
  Hits                 10171    10171           
  Misses                2004     2004           
Flag Coverage Δ
ceph-backend-test 64.32% <ø> (ø)
file-ft-tests 66.18% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 26.98% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 67.99% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v1-ft-tests 67.99% <ø> (ø)
multiple-backend 34.02% <ø> (ø)
sur-tests 35.38% <ø> (+0.85%) ⬆️
sur-tests-inflights 36.46% <ø> (ø)
unit 68.02% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 33.34% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 1, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@DarkIsDude
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 4, 2025

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch feature/CLDSRV-736/add-nodemon

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 4, 2025

Conflict with a changeset in the queue

The changeset in this pull request conflicts with another changeset
already in the queue. Please wait for the current queue to merge into
the development branch. The conflict will then appear in this pull
request and can be sorted on the feature branch directly.

This changeset has not been added to the queue.

The following options are set: approve

@DarkIsDude DarkIsDude force-pushed the feature/CLDSRV-736/add-nodemon branch from 829f193 to 0a69d1a Compare September 5, 2025 07:58
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 5, 2025

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch feature/CLDSRV-736/add-nodemon

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 5, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-736.

Goodbye darkisdude.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 0a69d1a into development/9.1 Sep 5, 2025
52 of 53 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the feature/CLDSRV-736/add-nodemon branch September 5, 2025 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants