Skip to content

Conversation

@lwjohnst86
Copy link
Member

Description

Closes #108

This PR needs an in-depth review.

Checklist

  • Ran spell-check
  • Formatted Markdown
  • Ran just run-all

@lwjohnst86 lwjohnst86 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2025 15:06
@lwjohnst86 lwjohnst86 moved this from Todo to In Review in Iteration planning Mar 10, 2025
[MySQL](https://www.mysql.com/)) because they require a server to
use and aren't stored as a file on a local filesystem.
- Excel or similar spreadsheet programs, as they aren't technically
open source nor do
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

something missing here?

Copy link
Contributor

@martonvago martonvago left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very interesting! 😊😊

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to In Progress in Iteration planning Mar 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: martonvago <57952344+martonvago@users.noreply.github.com>
@lwjohnst86 lwjohnst86 moved this from In Progress to In Review in Iteration planning Mar 13, 2025
@lwjohnst86 lwjohnst86 merged commit 7edf281 into main Mar 17, 2025
@lwjohnst86 lwjohnst86 deleted the docs/why-parquet-post branch March 17, 2025 14:37
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in Iteration planning Mar 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decision post on why Parquet

4 participants