-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
fix(config): Validation Logic for Configuration File Extension #76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
No longer case-sensitive, as the corresponding upstream packages do support case-insensitivity.
Added new Test Cases to check all combinations of File Content and case-insensitive File Extension permutations.
Improved the existing documentation by adding: - ArgumentError knowledge - UnsupportedError knowledge - FormatException knowledge - explicit mention of case-insensitive file extensions
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughNormalizes configuration file paths to lowercase for case-insensitive extension detection, adds explicit UnsupportedError for unknown extensions, documents caller expectations, and adds comprehensive tests covering JSON/YAML, extension casing, malformed content, unsupported extensions, and missing files. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant ConfigurationParser
participant FileSystem as _loadFile
Caller->>ConfigurationParser: fromFile(filePath)
ConfigurationParser->>FileSystem: _loadFile(filePath)
FileSystem-->>ConfigurationParser: fileContents or throws ArgumentError
alt fileContents returned
ConfigurationParser->>ConfigurationParser: normalize filePath (toLowerCase)
alt endsWith(".json")
ConfigurationParser->>ConfigurationParser: parse JSON via fromString (ConfigEncoding.json)
ConfigurationParser-->>Caller: return parsed Map
else endsWith(".yaml" or ".yml")
ConfigurationParser->>ConfigurationParser: parse YAML via fromString (ConfigEncoding.yaml)
ConfigurationParser-->>Caller: return parsed Map
else unsupported extension
ConfigurationParser-->>Caller: throws UnsupportedError
end
else missing file
FileSystem-->>Caller: throws ArgumentError
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/config/lib/src/config/configuration_parser.dart (1)
32-39: Documentation could be clearer about file existence validation.The documentation states "It is expected that the caller ensures [filePath] exists" but the code still validates file existence in
_loadFile(lines 58-60). While this defensive programming is good practice, the documentation could be more precise, e.g., "Validates that [filePath] exists and throws [ArgumentError] if not found."review_comment_end -->
packages/config/test/config/config_file_load_test.dart (1)
87-88: Consider removing debug print statements.Print statements in test setup add noise to test output. Consider removing them or making them conditional on a debug flag.
- print('Unique JSON extensions for testing: $jsonExtensionSamplesCount'); - print('Unique YAML extensions for testing: $yamlExtensionSamplesCount');review_comment_end -->
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/config/lib/src/config/configuration_parser.dart(1 hunks)packages/config/test/config/config_file_load_test.dart(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/config/lib/src/config/configuration_parser.dart (2)
41-47: LGTM! Case-insensitive extension check implemented correctly.The fix properly addresses issue #75 by normalizing the path to lowercase before extension checking. This ensures that extensions like
.JSON,.Json,.yaml,.YAML, etc., are all correctly recognized while maintaining backward compatibility.review_comment_end -->
53-53: Good addition of explicit error handling.Adding the explicit
UnsupportedErrorfor unrecognized extensions improves error clarity and ensures all code paths are properly handled.review_comment_end -->
packages/config/test/config/config_file_load_test.dart (4)
115-144: Excellent implementation of case-insensitive string generation.The recursive approach correctly generates all case variations while properly handling non-alphabetic characters. The logic is clean and well-structured.
review_comment_end -->
62-89: Good use of mathematical verification for test data integrity.The verification logic ensures uniqueness and correctness of generated extensions using the formula 2^n for n-character strings. This catches configuration errors early.
review_comment_end -->
155-200: Comprehensive test coverage for all scenarios.The test cases thoroughly cover all combinations of content validity, extension correctness, and file formats. Well-organized with descriptive test names.
review_comment_end -->
Also applies to: 202-247
249-276: Good coverage of non-existent file scenarios.Tests properly verify that missing files with supported extensions throw
ArgumentErrorwhile missing files with unsupported extensions throwUnsupportedError, ensuring correct error precedence.review_comment_end -->
For certain case-insensitive File Systems.
christerswahn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great bugfix! Just some restructuring of the tests is needed.
- improved a variable name - made a branch structure slightly more readable
Hardcoded the small output of generator-function.
- better description and coverage - readability improvements
|
@christerswahn sir, your review has significantly improved its readability and coverage. Thank you for introducing the GWT technique to my knowledge repertoire. |
christerswahn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job! LGTM!
Resolves #75
Its validation logic is no longer based on case-sensitive file extensions, as the corresponding upstream packages do support case-insensitivity. The new Test Cases validate this use-case, by checking all combinations of File Content and case-insensitive File Extension permutations.
Old Behavior
Supported file extensions are case-sensitive:

New Behavior
Supported file extensions are not case-sensitive:

Features
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests