Skip to content

Comments

Add MidHandshakeSslStream#424

Closed
alexcrichton wants to merge 1 commit intorust-openssl:masterfrom
alexcrichton:mid-handshake
Closed

Add MidHandshakeSslStream#424
alexcrichton wants to merge 1 commit intorust-openssl:masterfrom
alexcrichton:mid-handshake

Conversation

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Collaborator

Allows recognizing when a stream is still in handshake mode and can gracefully
transition when ready. The blocking usage of the API should still be the same,
just helps nonblocking implementations!

Allows recognizing when a stream is still in handshake mode and can gracefully
transition when ready. The blocking usage of the API should still be the same,
just helps nonblocking implementations!
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is intended to eventually go against the breaks branch, but right now it's against master. I ended up deleting some code instead of updating it if it looked like it was deleted on the breaks branch.

steffengy pushed a commit to steffengy/schannel-rs that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2016
Along the lines of `security-framework`'s version of this (and that being added
to [rust-openssl][openssl]) this adds a `MidHandshakeTlsStream` to allow
applications to concretely know when a handshake has been completed (e.g.
validation has all been cleared).

[openssl]: rust-openssl/rust-openssl#424
steffengy pushed a commit to steffengy/schannel-rs that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2016
Along the lines of `security-framework`'s version of this (and that being added
to [rust-openssl][openssl]) this adds a `MidHandshakeTlsStream` to allow
applications to concretely know when a handshake has been completed (e.g.
validation has all been cleared).

[openssl]: rust-openssl/rust-openssl#424
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing to retarget against the breaks branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant