SIMD-0560: Mandatory Delegation of Surplus Lamports #560
staccDOTsol
started this conversation in
SIMD Discussions
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I’m so miffed I have to do a discussion rather than opening a pr. lol. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
This SIMD proposes that the runtime sweep every lamport above an account's
rent-exempt minimum into approved liquid staking positions, unwinding
automatically on debit and on account close. Holding undelegated SOL above
the rent floor becomes a state the protocol no longer represents.
What this PR is actually for
The proposal is submitted in the expectation of rejection, and says so in its
front matter's own terms: its success criterion is not feature-gate
activation but a rejection rationale articulated at the same rigor as the
objections the document itself enumerates (enshrined-cartel layering, float
conservation/bank-run dynamics, yield convergence to zero at forced full
participation, and the rebasing reduction). The protocol currently holds an
implicit, unwritten position on what idle SOL is for; this PR is a forcing
function to get that position written down.
Reviewers are accordingly asked to reject it well.
Notes
renumber to match the actual PR number if it lands differently.
lists open empirical items with exact-figure methodology.
program state) is the salvageable artifact if the body dies as intended.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions