-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
implementation of external app #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: base-sha/a7af2c513020bfc3a1b2e538dd03602b427b082a
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
This is a benchmark review for experiment This pull request was cloned from Experiment configurationreview_config:
# User configuration for the review
# - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
# - <value> - use the value directly
user_review_config:
enable_ai_review: true
enable_rule_comments: false
enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
enable_docstring_comments: benchmark
enable_security_comments: benchmark
enable_tests_comments: benchmark
enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark
enable_functionality_review: benchmark
enable_approvals: true
ai_review_config:
# The model responses to use for the experiment
# - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
# - llm - call the language model to generate responses
model_responses:
comments_model: benchmark
comment_validation_model: benchmark
comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
complexity_model: benchmark
docstrings_model: benchmark
functionality_model: benchmark
security_model: benchmark
tests_model: benchmark
# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/avendesora/pythonbible/pull/161
- https://github.com/aaditkamat/personal-website/pull/170
- https://github.com/RiiConnect24/DNS-Server/pull/36
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5214
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5215
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5216
- https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/pull/1424
- https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/pull/1425
- https://github.com/MusicalNinjas/pyo3-stubgen/pull/2
- https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations/pull/1734
- https://github.com/MusicalNinjas/pyo3-stubgen/pull/3
- https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations/pull/1739
- https://github.com/kgaughan/mercury/pull/86
- https://github.com/kgaughan/gcredstash/pull/62
- https://github.com/kgaughan/gcredstash/pull/63
- https://github.com/kgaughan/gcredstash/pull/64
- https://github.com/kgaughan/gcredstash/pull/65
- https://github.com/Rxmeez/learn-cicd-starter/pull/2
- https://github.com/Rxmeez/learn-cicd-starter/pull/3
- https://github.com/Rxmeez/learn-cicd-starter/pull/4
- https://github.com/Rxmeez/learn-cicd-starter/pull/5
- https://github.com/Rxmeez/learn-cicd-starter/pull/6
- https://github.com/Rxmeez/learn-cicd-starter/pull/7
- https://github.com/kloudlite/api/pull/321
- https://github.com/kloudlite/kl/pull/91
- https://github.com/kloudlite/api/pull/323
- https://github.com/NoobInDaHause/NoobCogs/pull/14
- https://github.com/jschalk/jaar/pull/141
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/325
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/319
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2771
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2772
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/323
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2773
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/324
- https://github.com/tpaviot/pythonocc-core/pull/1331
- https://github.com/dreamerminsk/tasked/pull/2
- https://github.com/softboiler/boilercv/pull/195
- https://github.com/itsTPM/foxford-tools/pull/74
- https://github.com/browniebroke/deezer-python/pull/1048
- https://github.com/browniebroke/django-codemod/pull/1093
- https://github.com/elixir-cloud-aai/TESK/pull/177
- https://github.com/elixir-cloud-aai/TESK/pull/178
- https://github.com/approvals/ApprovalTests.Python/pull/165
- https://github.com/StartupOS/verinfast/pull/387
- https://github.com/StartupOS/verinfast/pull/388
- https://github.com/WesternFriend/westernfriend.org/pull/1064
- https://github.com/leshchenko1979/fast_bitrix24/pull/237
- https://github.com/potnisviraj/sourcery-demo/pull/1
- https://github.com/DevCycleHQ/js-sdks/pull/862
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
question: |
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
# Benchmark reviews generated by running
# python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []
|
SourceryAI
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @sourcery-ai-experiments-bot - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 5 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
| TargetNamespace *string `json:"targetNamespace,omitempty"` | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| type GithubComKloudliteOperatorApisCrdsV1ExternalAppSpec struct { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Consider adding validation for ExternalAppSpec fields
It might be beneficial to add validation logic for the fields in GithubComKloudliteOperatorApisCrdsV1ExternalAppSpec to ensure data integrity and prevent potential issues.
| type GithubComKloudliteOperatorApisCrdsV1ExternalAppSpec struct { | |
| type GithubComKloudliteOperatorApisCrdsV1ExternalAppSpec struct { | |
| Intercept *GithubComKloudliteOperatorApisCrdsV1Intercept `json:"intercept,omitempty"` | |
| Record string `json:"record" validate:"required"` | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment helpful?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment type correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment area correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| // CoreCreateExternalApp is the resolver for the core_createExternalApp field. | ||
| func (r *mutationResolver) CoreCreateExternalApp(ctx context.Context, envName string, externalApp entities.ExternalApp) (*entities.ExternalApp, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
issue (bug_risk): Consider handling potential nil values for externalApp
Ensure that externalApp is not nil before proceeding with the logic inside CoreCreateExternalApp. This can prevent potential runtime panics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment helpful?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment type correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment area correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| // CoreListExternalApps is the resolver for the core_listExternalApps field. | ||
| func (r *queryResolver) CoreListExternalApps(ctx context.Context, envName string, search *model.SearchExternalApps, pq *repos.CursorPagination) (*model.ExternalAppPaginatedRecords, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Consider adding pagination validation
It would be beneficial to add validation for the pq parameter to ensure that pagination parameters are within acceptable ranges.
| // CoreListExternalApps is the resolver for the core_listExternalApps field. | |
| func (r *queryResolver) CoreListExternalApps(ctx context.Context, envName string, search *model.SearchExternalApps, pq *repos.CursorPagination) (*model.ExternalAppPaginatedRecords, error) { | |
| func (r *queryResolver) CoreListExternalApps(ctx context.Context, envName string, search *model.SearchExternalApps, pq *repos.CursorPagination) (*model.ExternalAppPaginatedRecords, error) { | |
| if pq == nil || pq.Limit <= 0 || pq.Offset < 0 { | |
| return nil, errors.New("invalid pagination parameters") | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment helpful?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment type correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment area correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ | |||
| package domain | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Consider splitting large files
The external-app.go file is quite large. Consider splitting it into smaller, more manageable files based on functionality. This can improve readability and maintainability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment helpful?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment type correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment area correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What type of LLM test could this comment become?
- 👍 - this comment is really good/important and we should always make it
- 👎 - this comment is really bad and we should never make it
- no reaction - don't turn this comment into an LLM test
| @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ | |||
| package entities | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggestion: Consider adding validation for ExternalApp fields
It might be beneficial to add validation logic for the fields in the ExternalApp struct to ensure data integrity and prevent potential issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment helpful?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment type correct?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the comment area correct?
Resolves kloudlite#322