Skip to content

Conversation

@ZamoraEmmanuel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ZamoraEmmanuel ZamoraEmmanuel requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2025 21:27
InvalidContextError,
} from "@openfeature/server-sdk";
import type SplitIO from "@splitsoftware/splitio/types/splitio";

Copy link
Contributor

@EmilianoSanchez EmilianoSanchez Sep 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The open feature provider should receive the server-side splitFactory (SplitIO.ISDK), not the client, in case we need to access other SDK features in the future, like the manager, and for consistency with the OpenFeature Web provider that does require the splitFactory instance for accessing multiple clients.

Base automatically changed from fme-9851 to development September 8, 2025 18:11
ZamoraEmmanuel and others added 3 commits September 8, 2025 16:54
Co-authored-by: Emiliano Sanchez <emiliano.sanchez@harness.io>
ZamoraEmmanuel and others added 3 commits September 10, 2025 17:10
Co-authored-by: Emiliano Sanchez <emiliano.sanchez@harness.io>
@ZamoraEmmanuel ZamoraEmmanuel merged commit 518e36d into development Sep 10, 2025
1 check passed
@ZamoraEmmanuel ZamoraEmmanuel deleted the fme-9861 branch September 10, 2025 21:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants