Skip to content

Conversation

andreibondarev
Copy link
Contributor

@andreibondarev andreibondarev commented Apr 22, 2016

@andrew Cleaning up some legacy code

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 98.564% when pulling 236455c on andreibondarev:remove_legacy_code into a58748c on splitrb:master.

@andrew
Copy link
Member

andrew commented Apr 23, 2016

I wonder if that would cause breakages for anyone, maybe we can add deprecation warnings in for a release just to give anyone a heads up?

User class fix, adding specs

cleaned up old experiments on Trial.choose since user is memoized; also cleaned up experiments that have not started

Fix specs

Remove pry

Add whitespace

Reword a user spec description

Fix specs

Add the README note
Add deprecation warnings
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 98.337% when pulling 4674b51 on andreibondarev:remove_legacy_code into a58748c on splitrb:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 98.337% when pulling 4dd2c30 on andreibondarev:remove_legacy_code into a58748c on splitrb:master.

@andreibondarev
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andrew Good point! I've updated the code.

@andrew andrew merged commit a82c771 into splitrb:master Apr 25, 2016
@andrew
Copy link
Member

andrew commented Apr 25, 2016

👍 I've added a reminder to my calendar to come back and remove these in a couple of months

@andreibondarev andreibondarev deleted the remove_legacy_code branch April 25, 2016 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants