-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Document share consumer poison message protection and delivery count #4103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
artembilan
merged 1 commit into
spring-projects:main
from
sobychacko:share-consumer-delivery-count-clarification
Oct 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a question.
When we do
releasefor the intermittent errors, does broker ensure an order of records?Or when we use share group consumer the order of records is of the scope and we should treat every record as independent logical entity which does not effect any others?
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When using Share Groups, there's no ordering guarantee - records are distributed at the record level across any available consumer, so they can be processed out of order. When
release()is called, that record goes back into the pool and could be picked up by any consumer at any time, with no guarantee about when it gets redelivered relative to other records. Each record should be treated as an independent entity that doesn't depend on the order of others. If ordering matters for a use case, traditional consumer groups are the right choice since they provide ordering guarantees within each partition.