Skip to content

Conversation

@squarezw
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@squarezw
Copy link
Owner Author

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Key issues to review

Duplicate Code
The methods times(_ f: () -> ()) and times(_ f: @autoclosure () -> ()) in Int+Extension.swift are almost identical in functionality but differ only in the closure type. Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.

Type Safety
The variable desc in Test.swift is declared with a type of Any, which is not type-safe. Consider specifying a more precise type to improve code safety and clarity.

@squarezw
Copy link
Owner Author

squarezw commented Sep 17, 2024

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Best practice
Specify a more precise type than Any for better type safety

Use a specific type instead of Any for the desc variable to improve type safety and
clarity in your code.

demo/Test.swift [11-18]

-var desc: Any {
+var desc: NSAttributedString {
     let desc: NSAttributedString = NSAttributedString(string: "111")
     ...
     return para
 }
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: Specifying a more precise type than Any enhances type safety and clarity, which is a best practice in Swift programming.

9
Maintainability
Merge duplicate functions into one with a default parameter

Consider merging the two times functions into one by using a default parameter to
handle both use cases. This will reduce code duplication and improve
maintainability.

Foundation/Source/Helper(Extension)/Int+Extension.swift [11-24]

-func times(_ f: () -> ()) {
-    if self > 0 {
-        for _ in 0..<self {
-            f()
-        }
-    }
-}
-func times(_ f: @autoclosure () -> ()) {
+func times(_ f: @autoclosure @escaping () -> ()) {
     if self > 0 {
         for _ in 0..<self {
             f()
         }
     }
 }
 
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion effectively reduces code duplication by merging two similar functions into one, improving maintainability without losing functionality.

8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants