Skip to content

Conversation

@bertiethorpe
Copy link
Member

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe commented Oct 13, 2025

Bug slipped through CI because mpi.conf not populated in .stackhpc environment.

Fixed by correcting parentheses on the .items() method in mpi.conf.j2 template. dict.items without parentheses refers to the method itself, not the result of calling it, so Ansible is trying to iterate over a function object

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2025 11:33
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @bertiethorpe, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request implements a minor but crucial syntax correction within the mpi.conf.j2 Jinja2 template. The change ensures that the configuration file is generated correctly by adhering to the proper method call for iterating over dictionary items, thereby enhancing the reliability of the templating process and avoiding potential errors during configuration deployment.

Highlights

  • Jinja2 Templating Syntax Fix: Corrected the iteration syntax in the mpi.conf.j2 template from openhpc_mpi_config.items to openhpc_mpi_config.items() to ensure proper dictionary iteration in Jinja2, preventing potential rendering issues.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a syntax error in the mpi.conf.j2 Jinja2 template. The change adds the required parentheses to the .items() method call, which is necessary to iterate over the openhpc_mpi_config dictionary. While the fix itself is correct, I've noticed that the current test suite does not seem to cover this templating logic, as openhpc_mpi_config is empty by default. To improve robustness and prevent future regressions, I recommend extending the molecule tests to include a scenario where openhpc_mpi_config is populated and then verify the contents of the generated mpi.conf file.

Copy link
Contributor

@wtripp180901 wtripp180901 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe merged commit 9b63015 into master Oct 13, 2025
50 of 54 checks passed
@bertiethorpe bertiethorpe deleted the fix/mpi-conf-template branch October 13, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants