Skip to content

feat: use stapi pydantic in stapi fastapi #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

feat: use stapi pydantic in stapi fastapi #22

merged 10 commits into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

@j-tr
Copy link
Contributor

@j-tr j-tr commented Apr 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

  • Using models from stapi-pydantic and removing any obsolete models in stapi-fastapi
  • Subclass Product from stapi-pydantic in stapi-fastapi

resolves #11

@j-tr j-tr requested a review from gadomski April 1, 2025 16:32
@gadomski gadomski changed the title Use stapi pydantic in stapi fastapi feat: use stapi pydantic in stapi fastapi Apr 2, 2025
@gadomski gadomski linked an issue Apr 2, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Decoupling models from FastAPI implementation #32
Closed
@gadomski gadomski mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2025
Closed
gadomski
gadomski reviewed Apr 2, 2025
View reviewed changes
@gadomski gadomski enabled auto-merge (squash) April 2, 2025 08:41
@gadomski gadomski disabled auto-merge April 2, 2025 08:43
@gadomski gadomski merged commit 2f45e8c into stapi-spec:main Apr 2, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@gadomski gadomski gadomski left review comments

Assignees

@j-tr j-tr

@toro-berlin toro-berlin

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decoupling models from FastAPI implementation Update stapi-fastapi to use stapi-pydantic

3 participants

@j-tr @gadomski @toro-berlin