-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
blockifier: add disallow casm hash v1 declare falg to VC #8889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
blockifier: add disallow casm hash v1 declare falg to VC #8889
Conversation
|
Artifacts upload workflows: |
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
f50c284 to
95ef7f1
Compare
AvivYossef-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AvivYossef-starkware reviewed 12 of 13 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @noaov1)
noaov1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@noaov1 reviewed 12 of 13 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @meship-starkware)
crates/blockifier/resources/blockifier_versioned_constants_0_13_0.json line 29 at r2 (raw file):
"enable_reverts": false, "enable_casm_hash_migration": false, "disallow_casm_hash_v1_declares": false,
WDYT?
Suggestion:
"block_casm_hash_v1_declares": true,
meship-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @noaov1)
crates/blockifier/resources/blockifier_versioned_constants_0_13_0.json line 29 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, noaov1 (Noa Oved) wrote…
WDYT?
Just making sure this is a name change without a meaning change. What I mean by that is it's still false for all older versions and true from 0.14.1 and on
95ef7f1 to
a33229e
Compare
AvivYossef-starkware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AvivYossef-starkware reviewed 12 of 12 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status:complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @meship-starkware)

No description provided.