Skip to content

Conversation

@frastel
Copy link
Contributor

@frastel frastel commented Jul 24, 2025

Adds support for these query parameters:

  • published_at_gt
  • published_at_lt
  • first_published_at_gt
  • first_published_at_lt
  • updated_at_gt
  • updated_at_lt

More about this topic in the issue: #64

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.91%. Comparing base (006cdab) to head (13148c8).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #65      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     93.88%   93.91%   +0.02%     
- Complexity      461      488      +27     
============================================
  Files            72       79       +7     
  Lines          1620     1675      +55     
============================================
+ Hits           1521     1573      +52     
- Misses           99      102       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@OskarStark OskarStark changed the title feat(stories): Add published_at_gt and other date related query parameters (#64) feat(stories): Add published_at_gt and other date related query parameters Jul 30, 2025
@frastel
Copy link
Contributor Author

frastel commented Aug 1, 2025

Any further feedback?

@frastel
Copy link
Contributor Author

frastel commented Sep 1, 2025

Anything I could do so that the PR could be merged?

@silasjoisten
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @frastel sorry for the long response time. i will take a look here

@silasjoisten silasjoisten merged commit a2ac58f into storyblok:master Sep 18, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@silasjoisten
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you very much @frastel

@silasjoisten silasjoisten mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants