Missing relationship definition using relationships extended through archetypes

[gvgramazio]

Expected

Mentioning in Structurizr DSL > Language reference > relationship that is possible to declare basic relationships or relationships extended through archetypes.

Extended explicit relationship

<identifier> --<identifier>-> <identifier> [description] [technology] [tags] {
    ...
}

Extended implicit relationship

--<identifier>-> <identifier> [description] [technology] [tags] {
    ...
}

Actual

Only basic relationships are mentioned.

Steps to reproduce

N/A

Version/build information

N/A

Severity

Minor

Priority

Low (I have no budget and there's no rush - please fix this for free)

More information

No response

[simonbrowndotje]

The archetypes documentation pretty much only exists in the Patreon posts at the moment - it will be ported across at some point though.