refs #995 - fixing discriminator with remote enum reference #1004
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
frantuma
reviewed
Jan 28, 2019
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| }else if (prop.getValue() instanceof RefProperty) { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fix formatting add space after bracket
|
|
||
| }else if (prop.getValue() instanceof RefProperty) { | ||
| String ref = ((RefProperty) prop.getValue()).getSimpleRef(); | ||
| Object resolved = swagger.getDefinitions().get(ref); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
does this mean that the ref must have been already resolved? are we sure it will be so?
Contributor
|
please build |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
please build |
This was referenced Jan 30, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
refs #995 - fixing discriminator with remote enum reference