Skip to content

fix(agent): GKE Autopilot do not accept HTTP probe #1508

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

fix(agent): GKE Autopilot do not accept HTTP probe #1508

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

@mavimo
Copy link
Contributor

@mavimo mavimo commented Dec 1, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:

Checklist

  • Title of the PR starts with type and scope, (e.g. feat(agent,node-analyzer,sysdig-deploy):)
  • Chart Version bumped for the respective charts
  • Variables are documented in the README.md (or README.tpl in some charts)
  • Check GithubAction checks (like lint) to avoid merge-check stoppers
  • All test files are added in the tests folder of their respective chart and have a "_test" suffix

@mavimo mavimo self-assigned this Dec 1, 2023
@mavimo mavimo requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2023 17:14
@mavimo mavimo force-pushed the disable-http-readinessProbe-for-gke-autopilot branch from 4df871f to ef6da90 Compare December 1, 2023 17:15
@aroberts87 aroberts87 merged commit b8c3e33 into master Dec 1, 2023
@aroberts87 aroberts87 deleted the disable-http-readinessProbe-for-gke-autopilot branch December 1, 2023 17:27
IgorEulalio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
@mavimo @IgorEulalio
fix(agent): GKE Autopilot do not accept HTTP probe (#1508)
01f98ff
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba AlbertoBarba approved these changes

@aroberts87 aroberts87 aroberts87 approved these changes

Assignees

@mavimo mavimo

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@mavimo @AlbertoBarba @aroberts87