Wrapped list attribute naming questions: wrapped or wrapper element name?

[kenmalton]

Hello, I've been doing a deep dive into xsdata recently to assess its suitability for a project that I am working on. I think it looks like a wonderful library, thank you and well done!

I have some questions regarding wrapped lists and how the list's attribute is named on the generated dataclass. Questions are at the bottom after some introduction:

1. On the Wrapped List documentation page it implies that the attribute should be named after the wrapper element - "Books" in this case.

2. On the wrapperfields config documentation it shows that the attribute will be named after the wrapped element - "alpha", "bravo", "charlie" (singular). This is the implemented behaviour.

I think I prefer the first approach - partly because it feels more intuitive that the list attribute should have the plural name from the wrapped element, but also because it would make this document structure possible...

<Library>
  <BestBooks>
    <Title>python for beginners</Title>
    <Title>beautiful xml</Title>
  </BestBooks>
  <WorstBooks>
    <Title>python for nobody</Title>
    <Title>horrible xml</Title>
  </WorstBooks>
</Library>

I would like to know:

• is the current behaviour based on a principled decision, or an accident of implementation?
• I think I can get my preferred behaviour through monkeypatching the CreateWrapperFields.wrap_field method, but I don't know if that's a good idea and wonder if there is a better way?
• what would you think about making this configurable?

Thanks!