Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance the cluster resource type a bit. #1466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2019

Conversation

dlorenc
Copy link
Contributor

@dlorenc dlorenc commented Oct 24, 2019

I was trying it out with a GKE cluster, and noticed a few issues:

  • we require a username for everything, even if we're using CA auth.
  • we weren't checking token auth.

This should really be switched to a declarative system where resources can
specify optional params, but that can come as part of the larger refactor.
This makes things a bit nicer tot use in the meantime.

Changes

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Oct 24, 2019
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 24, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on pkg/.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/apis/pipeline/v1alpha1/pipelineresource_validation.go 88.7% 87.5% -1.2

gcloud container clusters describe <cluster-name> --format='value(endpoint)'
```

Then, create a secret with this information and use it as described above.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you distill this advice into a single easily-copypasteable script?

ENDPOINT=$(gcloud container clusters describe ${CLUSTER_NAME} --format='value=(endpoint)')
kubectl create sercret generic ${SECRET_NAME} \
  --from-literal=endpoint=${ENDPOINT} \
 ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll do that for the secret, but the endpoint actually goes into the resource directly under url. I'll show that with a smaller example I guess.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How's this? I stopped short of a full cat << EOF to create the secret and resource.

I was trying it out with a GKE cluster, and noticed a few issues:
- we require a username for everything, even if we're using CA auth.
- we weren't checking token auth.

This should really be switched to a declarative system where resources can
specify optional params, but that can come as part of the larger refactor.
This makes things a bit nicer tot use in the meantime.
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on pkg/.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/apis/pipeline/v1alpha1/pipelineresource_validation.go 88.7% 87.5% -1.2

Copy link
Member

@imjasonh imjasonh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 24, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ImJasonH

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 24, 2019
@dlorenc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dlorenc commented Oct 24, 2019

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit e3838c3 into tektoncd:master Oct 24, 2019
@dlorenc dlorenc deleted the cluster branch October 24, 2019 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants