Skip to content

Conversation

petecooper
Copy link
Member

I wrote this on Windows 95.

(Not really.)
@philwareham
Copy link
Member

Since no code has changed, I don't think we need to explicitly state in the HISTORY that Apache 1 is not officially support (that would be best suited to mention at documentation repo).

@petecooper
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm, OK. Fair point. How about System requirements instead of Changed?

I support 3x clients who run Textpattern on Apache 1.3, along with other antiquated software - there should be something in the HISTORY to say "this happened at that time", in my humble opinion.

@philwareham
Copy link
Member

But nothing actually happened, no code has changed that prevents Apache 1.x from running - or am I missing a previous commit that negates use of Apache 1.x?

@petecooper
Copy link
Member Author

You are correct, you're not missing anything - no code change. It's a documented support change.

@petecooper
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah, you're right - I'll close.

@petecooper petecooper closed this Jun 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants