Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Line 19 in 42a7396

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 42a7396

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 42a7396

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 42a7396

    
           Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be 
        
           reported by contacting the project team at tianhaoz@umich.edu. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 42a7396

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 42a7396

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 42a7396

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 42a7396

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 70 in 42a7396

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 42a7396

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 42a7396

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 42a7396

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 42a7396

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 42a7396

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 42a7396

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 42a7396

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 42a7396

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 42a7396

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 42a7396

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 42a7396

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 42a7396

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 42a7396

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 42a7396

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 42a7396

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 42a7396

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 42a7396

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 42a7396

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 42a7396

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 42a7396

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 42a7396

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 42a7396

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 42a7396

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 42a7396

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 42a7396

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 42a7396

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

readable-readme/src/README.md

Line 17 in 42a7396

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration.

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-24T19:27:26Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/502/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 42a7396

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 42a7396

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 42a7396

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 42a7396

    
           Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be 
        
           reported by contacting the project team at tianhaoz@umich.edu. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 42a7396

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 42a7396

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 42a7396

    
           is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 
        
           obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 42a7396

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

readable-readme/CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 70 in 42a7396

    
           This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 42a7396

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 42a7396

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 42a7396

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 42a7396

    
           In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit.

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 42a7396

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 42a7396

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 42a7396

    
           This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow:

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 42a7396

    
           It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed)

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 42a7396

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 42a7396

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 42a7396

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 42a7396

    
           excited in us a playful desire of imitation"  So, people were 
        
           stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 42a7396

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 42a7396

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 42a7396

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 42a7396

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 42a7396

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 42a7396

    
           it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 42a7396

    
           Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time.

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there.

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 42a7396

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 42a7396

    
           I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!!

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 42a7396

    
           Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool!

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility)

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 42a7396

    
           I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way.

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore...

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?)  ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers)

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 42a7396

    
           2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 42a7396

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 42a7396

    
           Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 42a7396

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 42a7396

    
           hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 42a7396

    
           thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 42a7396

    
           There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together,

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 42a7396

    
           so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 42a7396

    
           probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning