Skip to content

Conversation

@mgax
Copy link
Member

@mgax mgax commented Oct 8, 2024

  • Update the Readme with syntax highlighting.
  • Update PyPI links.
  • Set up CI and publishing actions.

@mgax mgax marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2024 14:05
@mgax mgax requested a review from tomusher October 8, 2024 14:05
tox.ini Outdated
py39-django42-wagtail62
py{39,310,311,312}-django42-wagtail62
py{310,311,312}-django{50,51}-wagtail62
py312-django42-wagtail{52,60,61,62}
Copy link
Member

@zerolab zerolab Oct 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drive-by suggestion

Suggested change
py312-django42-wagtail{52,60,61,62}
py312-django42-wagtail{52,62}

since 6.0 and 6.1 are no longer officially supported

other than that, I would take a more opinionated stance and do Python 3.11+ (but that is only me)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, good call about Wagtail versions, thanks!

I'm not sure about only supporting Python 3.11+ though. In general, I agree with the sentiment, but I can imagine somebody jumping in to rescue a legacy project, and hoping to pull the production database, without doing a major upgrade beforehand. It's a simple package, and doesn't cost us much to support older Pythons (aside from some CI time).

Copy link
Member

@zerolab zerolab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a few suggestions that can be addressed as a follow up.
Thanks @mgax

@mgax mgax merged commit 1bf93d9 into main Oct 22, 2024
6 checks passed
@mgax mgax deleted the chore/ci branch October 22, 2024 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants