cifs: fix lock ordering while disabling multichannel

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082641

The code to handle the case of server disabling multichannel
was picking iface_lock with chan_lock held. This goes against
the lock ordering rules, as iface_lock is a higher order lock
(even if it isn't so obvious).

This change fixes the lock ordering by doing the following in
that order for each secondary channel:
1. store iface and server pointers in local variable
2. remove references to iface and server in channels
3. unlock chan_lock
4. lock iface_lock
5. dec ref count for iface
6. unlock iface_lock
7. dec ref count for server
8. lock chan_lock again

Since this function can only be called in smb2_reconnect, and
that cannot be called by two parallel processes, we should not
have races due to dropping chan_lock between steps 3 and 8.

Fixes: ee1d217 ("cifs: handle when server stops supporting multichannel")
Reported-by: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5eef12c)
Signed-off-by: John Cabaj <john.cabaj@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Magali Lemes <magali.lemes@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: John Cabaj <john.cabaj@canonical.com>

Author: smfrench

fs/cifs/sess.c

@@ -322,28 +322,32 @@ cifs_disable_secondary_channels(struct cifs_ses *ses)
 		iface = ses->chans[i].iface;
 		server = ses->chans[i].server;
 
+		/*
+		 * remove these references first, since we need to unlock
+		 * the chan_lock here, since iface_lock is a higher lock
+		 */
+		ses->chans[i].iface = NULL;
+		ses->chans[i].server = NULL;
+		spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
+
 		if (iface) {
 			spin_lock(&ses->iface_lock);
 			kref_put(&iface->refcount, release_iface);
-			ses->chans[i].iface = NULL;
 			iface->num_channels--;
 			if (iface->weight_fulfilled)
 				iface->weight_fulfilled--;
 			spin_unlock(&ses->iface_lock);
 		}
 
-		spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
-		if (server && !server->terminate) {
-			server->terminate = true;
-			cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect(server, false);
-		}
-		spin_lock(&ses->chan_lock);
-
 		if (server) {
-			ses->chans[i].server = NULL;
+			if (!server->terminate) {
+				server->terminate = true;
+				cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect(server, false);
+			}
 			cifs_put_tcp_session(server, false);
 		}
 
+		spin_lock(&ses->chan_lock);
 	}
 
 done: