fs: support root_marker #25
Merged
+5
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
skshetry
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
skshetry
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
skshetry
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
skshetry
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
efiop
added a commit
to efiop/scmrepo
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
efiop
added a commit
to efiop/scmrepo
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
efiop
added a commit
to efiop/scmrepo
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
efiop
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2022
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fsspec filesystems don't yet have a notion of cwd, so "." should not be used.
Instead, we should support using fs.root_marker ("" in our case), which is
currently broken.