Parser tests

[roback]

• Added tests for the parser, Add tests that actually tests the parser #17 (similar to the ones in Improve parser specs twingly-search-api-ruby#49)
• Made sure that the tests passed by fixing Tags not returned from parser #18

To quote @dentarg in twingly/twingly-search-api-ruby#49 😄

Not the prettiest tests in the world, but now we actually check the result from the parsing.

[walro]

How about implementing __eq__ on post instead. Seems to be pretty straight-foward:

def __eq__(self, other):
        return (isinstance(other, self.__class__)
            and self.__dict__ == other.__dict__)

See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/390250/elegant-ways-to-support-equivalence-equality-in-python-classes

[roback]

How about implementing eq on post instead.

TIL about __dict__ :)

One disadvantage is that it becomes impossible to find out whats wrong by looking at the test output:

AssertionError: 'Skvallernytt.se' != u'FEL'

# becomes:

AssertionError: <twingly_search.post.Post object at 0x10a8b76d0> != <twingly_search.post.Post object at 0x10a8b75d0>

[walro]

That's true.

[walro]

Looks shippable to me.

[dentarg]