Skip to content

Conversation

@cherukum-Amazon
Copy link

Description

Description

This pull request adds a new blog post titled “Valkey Helm: The new way to deploy Valkey on Kubernetes”.
The blog explains why the Valkey project now provides an official Helm chart, summarizes recent Bitnami changes affecting users, and provides a detailed step-by-step migration guide for moving from Bitnami’s Valkey chart to the official Valkey chart.

The post includes:

  1. Background on Bitnami image/chart policy changes
  2. Benefits of using the Valkey-maintained Helm chart
  3. Essential features of the official chart
  4. A full in-place migration walkthrough
  5. Rollback instructions
  6. Next steps for chart improvements

This helps users adopt the official Helm chart safely and confidently.

Issues Resolved

This PR contributes toward addressing the community request for an official Helm chart and supporting documentation.
It provides the end-to-end migration guidance referenced in:

valkey-io/valkey#2371 (request for an official Helm chart)

Check List

  • [ x] Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the BSD-3-Clause License.

Signed-off-by: cherukum-amazon <cherukum@amazon.com>
Copy link
Member

@stockholmux stockholmux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the blog! It has some usability issues with the code samples but they should be pretty easy to fix.

Otherwise, it's just little things that need attention. With the fixes, I think we can publish next week if you can get to the changes required ASAP.

title = "Valkey Helm: The new way to deploy Valkey on Kubernetes"
date = 2025-11-05
description = "A guide on why the new Valkey Helm chart exists, how it helps, and how to migrate from Bitnami."
author = ["maheshcherukumilli"]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your bio isn't showing so change 'author' to 'authors'

featured_image = "/assets/media/featured/valkey-helm.webp"
+++

## Bitnami changes and why it matters
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't follow proper heading/content hierarchy. Each heading needs to have content immediately following it, not another heading.

I would just remove the h2 here and go directly into the next paragraph.


## Bitnami changes and why it matters

Bitnami is changing how it publishes and supports many container images and Helm charts (**see [charts issue #35164](https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164), [charts issue #36215](https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/36215), and the [Bitnami Secure Images announcement](https://news.broadcom.com/app-dev/broadcom-introduces-bitnami-secure-images-for-production-ready-containerized-applications)**). Some images move behind new terms, and older tags may not be available as before. If your pipelines pull Bitnami charts or images during deploys, you can see rollouts fail (ImagePullBackOff, auth/404), clusters drift (staging keeps old cached bits while prod can’t pull or resolves a different tag), and “invisible” upgrades when a moved tag points to a new digest. During incidents, rollbacks slow down or fail because the old image isn’t fetchable. Compliance can break, security patches can stall behind limits or paywalls, and you may face surprise licensing or mirroring costs. Net effect: slower releases, harder debugging, inconsistent environments, and higher operational and business risk.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unbold the parenthetical starting with "see"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

put ImagePullBackOff in backticks e.g. ImagePullBackOff


Bitnami is changing how it publishes and supports many container images and Helm charts (**see [charts issue #35164](https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164), [charts issue #36215](https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/36215), and the [Bitnami Secure Images announcement](https://news.broadcom.com/app-dev/broadcom-introduces-bitnami-secure-images-for-production-ready-containerized-applications)**). Some images move behind new terms, and older tags may not be available as before. If your pipelines pull Bitnami charts or images during deploys, you can see rollouts fail (ImagePullBackOff, auth/404), clusters drift (staging keeps old cached bits while prod can’t pull or resolves a different tag), and “invisible” upgrades when a moved tag points to a new digest. During incidents, rollbacks slow down or fail because the old image isn’t fetchable. Compliance can break, security patches can stall behind limits or paywalls, and you may face surprise licensing or mirroring costs. Net effect: slower releases, harder debugging, inconsistent environments, and higher operational and business risk.

To reduce the impact on Valkey deployments, the community created an official, project-owned Helm chart (**request: [issue #2371](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey/issues/2371)**, **chart: [valkey-helm](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm)**). With the official chart, you can pin chart and image versions, keep `values.yaml` in code, and upgrade on your schedule without depending on vendor policy changes.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unbold the parenthetical starting with "request"

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"owned" is a weird word in open source. Maybe 'project-maintained' ?


### Why a Valkey maintained chart helps

With the official chart, you run what you intend, not what a third party changes. Pin a chart release from the Valkey repo (for example `--version 0.7.7` from [https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm)) and lock the Valkey image tag in your `values.yaml`. Because the chart follows Valkey releases and docs, you can bump versions in a pull request, test in staging, then promote the same versions to production. If something breaks, use Helm history to roll back with `helm rollback <release> <revision>`. Keep your values in source control, often per environment (`values.staging.yaml`, `values.prod.yaml`), and you get a clean GitOps flow. For details and examples, see the README: https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm#readme.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid using a raw URLs and link the README

Although I think the raw URL makes sense for the 0.7.7 example.


## Next steps

This is the rough plan. We will keep the work visible in the repo at [https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a rough plan? What does that mean?

Shorten the link to text to valkey-io/valkey-helm

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change 'We will keep the work visible in the repo' to something like 'All development on this Helm chart occurs in the open'.

(The future tense isn't correct in the original and I like to avoid conusing 'we' statements).


This is the rough plan. We will keep the work visible in the repo at [https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm).

* **Cluster mode.** Make it easy to run primaries and replicas across slots with sane defaults.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do any of these have links to issues?

* **Upgrades.** Publish notes tied to Valkey releases. Add hooks and checks so failures are obvious and quick to revert.
* **Docs.** Keep them short. Add clear examples. Link to deeper guides only when needed.

If you currently rely on Bitnami, test this chart in a dev cluster and try your normal workflows. If something is missing, open an issue at [https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm/issues](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm/issues). Once you try out the official Valkey helm chart please share feedback so the chart grows in the right direction.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change the link text to 'valkey-io/valkey-helm'

* **Docs.** Keep them short. Add clear examples. Link to deeper guides only when needed.

If you currently rely on Bitnami, test this chart in a dev cluster and try your normal workflows. If something is missing, open an issue at [https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm/issues](https://github.com/valkey-io/valkey-helm/issues). Once you try out the official Valkey helm chart please share feedback so the chart grows in the right direction.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditch the extra lines at the end please

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

something is wonky with the horizontal spacing. The plus sign is centred perfectly but the helm logo is far closer to the right side of the plus than the valkey logo is to the left side of the plus.

Also each blue is every so slightly different.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants