Which columns should be considered to be filtered for precursor quantification? #953
Unanswered
MaldackerM
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
PEP filter is enough to ensure general identification confidence. A combination of Ms1.Profile.Corr and Mass.Evidence can be used to boost peptidoform mass assignment confidence. If you have isolated runs where you need to verify confident identification, you can export chromatograms with --vis and also check them manually. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
i am currently running some analysis that require to filter for high confidence peptides that should be quantified. During this - while scrolling through the main output report from DIANN - I wondered which values are to consider for filtering. For example, what are the columns of Quantity.Quality, MS1.Profile.Corr, Mass.Evidence, Averagine and Decoy.Evidence telling me and what are considerable cutoff values that allow me stringent filtering to have high confidence quantification and identification results.
I know that has been partly discussed before, but I also wondered if there is any kind of interplay for these values.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions