We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
fix: address 11 review issues across document - Fix tool count: 10 → 12 - Remove duplicate horizontal rule - Rename summary table: 'Multi-Agent DAG Orchestration' → 'Full CLI Comparison' - Standardize per-tool formatting: add Verdict lines to Claude, Copilot, Amazon Q, Continue, OpenHands - Mark speculative ACP claims for Copilot and Goose - Add footnote for Block/AAIF acronyms - Clarify NeurIPS 2025 citation - Remove emoji from gpt-engineer for consistency - Add explicit answer to architectural question - Add model translation table complexity estimate (~15-20 entries) - Tighten Final Verdict opening paragraph
Revert "fix: rephrase DAG verdict per ChatGPT feedback — 'genuine differentiator' → 'strongest native ergonomics, ecosystem moving to protocol-based orchestration'" This reverts commit f81912acbd1a2b6ee8bb96f9e88efb6e668b6565.
fix: rephrase DAG verdict per ChatGPT feedback — 'genuine differentiator' → 'strongest native ergonomics, ecosystem moving to protocol-based orchestration'
fix: correct DAG orchestration analysis — distinguish in-CLI from external orchestration Previously stated DAG orchestration 'cannot port' to other CLIs. This conflates in-CLI task() spawning (OpenCode-only) with external orchestration (feasible for all CLIs). Changes: - Rewrote DAG section: distinguish two separate questions - Added per-tool external DAG methods comparison table - Added native vs external orchestration comparison table - Revised three bridge approaches - Updated Verdict table with separate rows for in-CLI/external - Updated Bottom line and Final Verdict to reflect distinction - Total: +36 lines, expanded analysis
feat: add DAG evaluations for 10 CLI tools including Goose, MetaGPT, ChatDev, gpt-engineer, Open Interpreter, Aider, Amazon Q, Continue, OpenHands
docs: rewrite for readability, add reference links
docs: add architecture evaluation for code installation structure refactor