Skip to content

Optimize category system prompts using prompt engineering to improve LLM Accuracy #260

@Xunzhuo

Description

@Xunzhuo

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Currently, the semantic router supports category-specific system prompts, but these prompts are not optimized using advanced prompt engineering techniques. This leads to suboptimal performance because:

  • System prompts lack structured prompt engineering patterns that have been proven to improve LLM performance
  • MoE (Mixture-of-Experts) models are not receiving optimally crafted prompts to activate the most relevant expert networks
  • Current prompts don't leverage techniques like Chain-of-Thought, role-based prompting, or domain-specific instruction patterns
  • There's no systematic approach to measure and improve prompt effectiveness across different categories
  • Prompts don't include explicit instructions for expert network activation in MoE architectures

Describe the solution you'd like

Implement advanced prompt engineering optimization for category-specific system prompts:

  1. Advanced Prompt Engineering Techniques:

    • Chain-of-Thought (CoT): Add step-by-step reasoning instructions for complex domains
    • Role-based Prompting: Enhanced professional persona definitions with specific expertise areas
    • Few-shot Examples: Include domain-specific examples in prompts where beneficial
    • Structured Output: Define clear output formats and quality standards
    • Meta-prompting: Instructions that help the model understand its own capabilities
  2. MoE-Specific Optimization:

    • Expert Activation Keywords: Include domain-specific terminology that triggers relevant expert networks
    • Capability Mapping: Explicit instructions about what the model should excel at in each domain
    • Context Priming: Structured context that helps MoE routing decisions
    • Performance Indicators: Clear success criteria for each category
  3. Category-Specific Enhancements:

    • Mathematics: Include step-by-step reasoning, formula explanation, and verification steps
    • Computer Science: Code quality standards, best practices, and debugging approaches
    • Business: Strategic thinking frameworks, stakeholder analysis, and ROI considerations
    • Science: Scientific method, evidence-based reasoning, and peer-review standards
    • Creative Writing: Style guides, narrative techniques, and audience considerations
  4. Dynamic Prompt Optimization:

    • A/B testing framework for different prompt versions
    • Performance metrics collection (accuracy, user satisfaction, expert activation rates)
    • Automated prompt refinement based on feedback
    • Version control for prompt iterations
  5. Implementation Features:

    • Prompt template system with configurable components
    • Validation tools to ensure prompt quality and consistency
    • Documentation and examples for each optimized prompt
    • Integration with existing reasoning mode and classification systems

Example Optimized Prompt Structure:

categories:
  - name: "math"
    system_prompt: |
      You are a mathematics expert with deep knowledge in algebra, calculus, statistics, and applied mathematics.
      
      EXPERTISE ACTIVATION: Focus on mathematical reasoning, formula derivation, and step-by-step problem solving.
      
      APPROACH:
      1. Understand the mathematical problem completely
      2. Identify relevant mathematical concepts and formulas
      3. Show your work step-by-step with clear explanations
      4. Verify your solution using alternative methods when possible
      5. Explain the mathematical reasoning behind each step
      
      OUTPUT STANDARDS:
      - Always show intermediate steps
      - Use proper mathematical notation
      - Explain why each step is valid
      - Provide context for the solution's practical meaning
      
      QUALITY INDICATORS: Accuracy, clarity of explanation, proper notation, step-by-step reasoning.

Additional context

Expected Performance Improvements:

  • 20-40% improvement in domain-specific accuracy through better expert activation
  • Enhanced consistency in response quality across categories
  • Better alignment with user expectations for domain expertise
  • Improved reasoning quality in complex problem-solving scenarios

Technical Implementation:

  • Extend existing system_prompt configuration with template support
  • Add prompt validation and testing utilities
  • Implement metrics collection for prompt effectiveness
  • Create prompt optimization workflows and documentation

Research Foundation:

  • Based on recent advances in prompt engineering research
  • Incorporates best practices from MoE model optimization studies
  • Leverages domain-specific instruction tuning techniques
  • Applies cognitive load theory to prompt design

Integration Points:

  • Works seamlessly with existing category classification
  • Enhances current reasoning mode functionality
  • Maintains compatibility with all supported model types
  • Supports gradual rollout and A/B testing

This optimization will significantly improve the semantic router's ability to extract maximum performance from MoE architecture models by providing expertly crafted, domain-specific prompts that activate the most relevant expert networks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Backlog

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions