You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The index member of measure-global has always seemed a bit of a one-off to me. It seems even more so now that all objects (including measure-global) have an id field.
It has seemed clear to me that index is not useful for finding the part measure for a global measure or vice-versa. That should strictly be done with the actual array index, I would think.
So what is index for? When should one prefer it over id and when should one prefer id?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The
indexmember ofmeasure-globalhas always seemed a bit of a one-off to me. It seems even more so now that all objects (includingmeasure-global) have anidfield.It has seemed clear to me that
indexis not useful for finding the part measure for a global measure or vice-versa. That should strictly be done with the actual array index, I would think.So what is
indexfor? When should one prefer it overidand when should one preferid?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions