Skip to content

Structure spec as a vocabulary? #5

@michael-n-cooper

Description

@michael-n-cooper

Personalization semantics defines a set of attributes, but arguably these attributes mainly serve to define a vocabulary. Other technologies such as RDFa and HTML Microdata could also add similar semantics to content, but that won't be useful unless the vocabulary is standardized. We might want to consider focusing the spec on the vocabulary, and leaving the specific attributes to implementation. Or separate the "vocabulary" aspects of the spec from the "ARIA features" aspects, so the vocabulary part can be reused by others.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions