Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 16, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@insin
Copy link
Collaborator

@insin insin commented Jun 20, 2017

peerDependencies string from webpack-defaults

@jsf-clabot
Copy link

jsf-clabot commented Jun 20, 2017

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #114 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #114   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.12%   91.12%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         169      169           
=======================================
  Hits          154      154           
  Misses         15       15
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/plugin.js 89.02% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ed1edd6...877fb7e. Read the comment docs.

},
"peerDependencies": {
"webpack": "^1.12.0 || ^2.1.0-beta.0 || ^2.1.0"
"webpack": "^1.0.0 || ^2.0.0 || >= 3.0.0-rc.0 || ^3.0.0"
Copy link
Member

@michael-ciniawsky michael-ciniawsky Jun 20, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

- >= 3.0.0-rc.0

?

It's just noise to set beta, rc, next etc imho :)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just doing what webpack-defaults does - does it need to be in there @d3viant0ne, given the short run of the RC?

@michael-ciniawsky michael-ciniawsky changed the title Support Webpack 3 chore(package): update devDependencies && peerDependencies (webpack v2.2.1...3.0.0) Jun 20, 2017
@michael-ciniawsky
Copy link
Member

michael-ciniawsky commented Jun 26, 2017

@insin This is ready, I suppose ? :)

Copy link
Member

@michael-ciniawsky michael-ciniawsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@insin thx

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants