Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

babel-loader just published its new version 6.2.8.

State Update 🚀
Dependency babel-loader
New version 6.2.8
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of babel-loader.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

v6.2.8

🐛 Bug Fix

📝 Documentation

  • Update README docs for cacheDirectory's actual behaviour (#245) @sohkai
  • updates docs re: transform-runtime (#197) @gbrassey

🏠 Internal


The new version differs by 16 commits .

  • cd909d6 6.2.8
  • fcb606b Fix typo
  • 8ed32d9 Update dev dependencies (#332)
  • 78a7ae6 Changelog 6.2.8 (#328) [skip ci]
  • d2f236d Gbrassey update docs (#331) (#197)
  • 13c34a5 Use babel-loader instead of babel (#330)
  • 501d60d fix options.sourceFileName gennerate bug (#260)
  • a8b9189 Fix tests
  • 8fa7946 Update README docs for cacheDirectory's actual behaviour
  • 0425535 Add test for cacheDirectory=true in query
  • f86507f gzipped files should have .gz as the extension, not .gzip (#326)
  • 4eace42 Use eslint, nyc (#321)
  • 19052e4 Adjust travis config (#320)
  • 960df45 Use babel to compile babel-loader (#319)
  • c217a9c Ignore yarn.lock

There are 16 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 72.0% when pulling 7d77e57f35ce4d57932f8e89a39a6dcdb27d834f on greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 into 8cc0199 on master.

@nason nason force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 branch from 7d77e57 to 8a87d39 Compare November 18, 2016 20:42
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 72.0% when pulling 8a87d391df42fcd465191b96b641c1228ebde8a1 on greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 into e64215c on master.

@nason nason force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 branch from 8a87d39 to 162b456 Compare November 18, 2016 20:57
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 72.0% when pulling 162b456d04c595c4de1683fd23f0af3656ca7652 on greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 into 00dcd7b on master.

@nason nason force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 branch from 162b456 to 6c12c43 Compare November 22, 2016 18:43
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 72.0% when pulling 6c12c4321f055328ee2491c66f4876c8dc715101 on greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 into d464e80 on master.

@nason nason force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 branch from 6c12c43 to 4e4b351 Compare November 23, 2016 16:24
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 72.0% when pulling 4e4b3518977ecc3f5fbc1d55581cfa1add470973 on greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 into dd426ec on master.

@nason nason force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 branch from 4e4b351 to 2636e22 Compare November 28, 2016 21:02
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 72.0% when pulling 2636e22 on greenkeeper-babel-loader-6.2.8 into be4c68f on master.

@nason nason closed this Nov 30, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants