Skip to content

Carbon kernel changes for tenant delete implementation #36

Closed
godwinamila wants to merge 2 commits intowso2:release-4.3.0from
godwinamila:tenant_delete
Closed

Carbon kernel changes for tenant delete implementation #36
godwinamila wants to merge 2 commits intowso2:release-4.3.0from
godwinamila:tenant_delete

Conversation

@godwinamila
Copy link

No description provided.

@wso2-jenkins-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch? NOTE: If you are not a committer of this repo, you probably need to send this Pull Request to wso2-dev repo instead.

@godwinamila godwinamila changed the title Tenant delete Carbon kernel changes for Tenant delete implementation Oct 15, 2014
@godwinamila godwinamila changed the title Carbon kernel changes for Tenant delete implementation Carbon kernel changes for tenant delete implementation Oct 15, 2014
@GayashanNA
Copy link

Hi Godwin,

When you are branching, you should branch the release-4.3.0 branch instead of master branch. Can you resend the pull request with only your changes? (Without create radme file changes)

Thanks.
Gayashan

@godwinamila
Copy link
Author

Resent the pull request [1]

[1] #38

arunasujith added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2015
Fixed a typo in class description
Pushpalanka pushed a commit to Pushpalanka/carbon4-kernel that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2015
Fix for CARBON-14866 - tenant id is initialized from the constructor - Patch from Gayashan
senthuran16 pushed a commit to senthuran16/carbon-kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
senthuran16 pushed a commit to senthuran16/carbon-kernel that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
wso2-jenkins-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2025
RivinduM pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
RivinduM pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants