Skip to content

Conversation

@dnozay
Copy link
Member

@dnozay dnozay commented Jan 10, 2016

The intent is that if code coverage report are combined, then
parallelizing with tox-travis may make sense.
Using both tools as I want to see which one is better.

The intent is that if code coverage report are combined, then
parallelizing with tox-travis may make sense.
Using both tools as I want to see which one is better.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 94.83%

Branch #117 has no coverage reports uploaded yet.

No diff could be generated. No reports for master found.

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

dnozay added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2016
Use codecov and coveralls.
@dnozay dnozay merged commit c33018a into master Jan 10, 2016
@dnozay dnozay deleted the cov branch January 10, 2016 20:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants