feat: Update prependTo method tests to validate name preservation and remove unnecessary validation.
#30
Conversation
…nd remove unnecessary validation.
WalkthroughThe test case Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestCase
participant ChildNode1
participant ChildNode2
participant ParentNode
TestCase->>ChildNode1: Set 'name' to 'x'
TestCase->>ChildNode2: Set 'name' to 'x'
TestCase->>ChildNode1: prependTo(ParentNode) (default validation)
TestCase->>ChildNode2: prependTo(ParentNode, runValidation=false)
TestCase->>ChildNode2: Assert 'name' is still 'x'
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #30 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
Complexity 90 90
===========================================
Files 2 2
Lines 469 469
===========================================
Hits 469 469 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)
2013-2013: Consider test explicitness vs simplicity.Removing the explicit
trueparameter relies on the default behavior, which is functionally correct. While this simplifies the call, the explicit parameter made the test intent clearer. The change aligns with the PR objective to remove unnecessary validation parameters.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (1)
prependTo(966-972)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
- GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (2)
2009-2009: LGTM: Improved test data initialization.The change from empty string to
'x'for the name attribute ensures consistent test behavior with strict validation rules. This creates more predictable test conditions for validation failure scenarios.Also applies to: 2027-2027
2042-2046: Excellent addition: validates name preservation behavior.This new assertion perfectly addresses the PR objective by verifying that node data remains unchanged when validation is skipped. The use of
assertSameensures strict equality checking, and the descriptive message clearly explains the expected behavior.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit