Skip to content

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 30, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Improved clarity and consistency of assertion failure messages in nested set behavior tests.
    • Added a new test to verify that leaf nodes are consistently ordered by their left attribute when using the leaves method.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This update refines assertion messages in NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php for consistency and clarity and adds a new test to NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php to verify that leaf node ordering relies on the left attribute. No changes are made to test logic except for the addition of the new test method.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Standardized assertion messages to consistently quote method names; rephrased messages for clarity.
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php Fixed string quoting in one assertion message; added a test to verify leaf node ordering by left attribute.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Test as testLeavesMethodRequiresLeftAttributeOrderingForConsistentResults
  participant DB as Database
  participant Model as NestedSet Model

  Test->>Model: Create root node
  Test->>Model: Create leaf1, leaf2
  Test->>Model: Append leaf1, leaf2 to root
  Test->>Model: Fetch leaves (initial order)
  Test->>DB: Update lft/rgt values for leaves and root
  Test->>Model: Fetch leaves (after update)
  Test->>Test: Assert leaves count and order by lft values
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

In the warren of code where the test bunnies play,
Assertion messages now quote what they say.
Leaves line up neatly, left to the right,
Ensuring the order is perfectly tight.
With every hop, our tests grow strong—
🐇 Clarity and order, all day long!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 phpcs (3.7.2)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid date.timezone value 'UTC', using 'UTC' instead in Unknown on line 0

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class "Phar" not found in /usr/local/bin/phpcs:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /usr/local/bin/phpcs on line 3

tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php

Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid date.timezone value 'UTC', using 'UTC' instead in Unknown on line 0

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class "Phar" not found in /usr/local/bin/phpcs:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /usr/local/bin/phpcs on line 3


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a642434 and 85a79d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (14 hunks)
  • tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (3)
src/NestedSetsBehavior.php (2)
  • insertBefore (654-660)
  • isRoot (753-756)
tests/TestCase.php (3)
  • loadFixtureXML (220-237)
  • buildFlatXMLDataSet (50-91)
  • getDataSet (134-150)
tests/support/model/MultipleTree.php (1)
  • MultipleTree (18-59)
🪛 PHPMD (2.15.0)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

791-791: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\MultipleTree' in method 'testReturnTrueAndMatchXmlAfterInsertBeforeDownForTreeAndMultipleTree'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1)

626-626: LGTM! Consistent assertion message formatting.

The updates consistently enclose method names in single quotes throughout the assertion messages, improving readability and maintaining uniformity across the test suite.

Also applies to: 635-635, 722-722, 731-731, 742-742, 751-751, 755-755, 763-763, 775-775, 784-784, 788-788, 795-795, 804-804, 808-808, 816-816, 1722-1722, 1756-1756, 1761-1761, 1982-1982, 1986-1986, 1991-1991, 1996-1996, 2001-2001, 2024-2024, 2313-2313, 2320-2320

tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (2)

114-114: LGTM! Consistent assertion message formatting.

Similar to the other test file, these updates improve readability by consistently formatting assertion messages.

Also applies to: 121-121


127-191: Excellent test addition that addresses the PR objective.

This new test method provides valuable verification for the leaves() method ordering behavior:

  • Comprehensive coverage: Tests that leaf nodes are correctly ordered by their lft attribute values
  • Realistic scenario: Manually updates lft/rgt values to simulate reordering, then verifies the query behavior
  • Clear assertions: Checks both node count and ordering, with descriptive error messages
  • Aligns with PR goals: Directly addresses the stated objective of adding verification for leaves method ordering

The test implementation follows good practices with proper setup, clear expectations, and thorough validation of the ordering behavior.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a642434) to head (85a79d6).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #40   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        90        90           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            470       470           
===========================================
  Hits             470       470           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 30, 2025 22:39
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a new test to verify that leaves() results are consistently ordered by the left attribute and normalizes assertion message quoting across two test classes.

  • Fixed inconsistent quote escaping in assertion messages.
  • Introduced testLeavesMethodRequiresLeftAttributeOrderingForConsistentResults in NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php.
  • Updated various assertion messages in NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php for quoting consistency.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php Cleaned up inner quotes and added a new leaves-order test
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Normalized quote style in assertion messages
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (6)

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1722

  • Assertion message is grammatically unclear. Consider rephrasing to "Child node depth should be 1 after being appended to the root node." or "... after calling appendTo on the root node."
                'Child node depth should be \'1\' after being \'appendTo\' the root node.',

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1756

  • Assertion message is grammatically unclear. Consider "Child node left value should be 2 after being appended to the root node." or "... after calling appendTo on the root node."
            'Child node left value should be \'2\' after being \'appendTo\' to the root node.',

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1761

  • Assertion message is grammatically unclear. Consider "Child node right value should be 3 after being appended to the root node." or "... after calling appendTo on the root node."
            'Child node right value should be \'3\' after being \'appendTo\' the root node.',

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1991

  • Remove unnecessary quotes around numeric literal. Use "Root node should have left value of 1." for clarity.
            'Root node should have left value of \'1\'.',

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:1996

  • Remove unnecessary quotes around numeric literal. Use "Root node should have right value of 2." for clarity.
            'Root node should have right value of \'2\'.',

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:2001

  • Remove unnecessary quotes around numeric literal. Use "Root node should have depth of 0." for clarity.
            'Root node should have depth of \'0\'.',

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw merged commit 29e2fbb into main Jun 30, 2025
43 checks passed
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw deleted the fix-mini-34 branch June 30, 2025 22:57
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant