Skip to content

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jul 1, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new test to verify that root nodes are correctly ordered by the left attribute when the tree attribute is disabled.

…ibute is disabled in `NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest`.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Walkthrough

A new test method was added to the NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest class. This test checks that when the treeAttribute is disabled, the roots() query orders results by the lft attribute, ensuring correct and deterministic retrieval of root nodes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php Added a test to verify roots() query orders by lft when treeAttribute is disabled.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as testRootsMethodRequiresLeftAttributeOrderingWhenTreeAttributeIsDisabled
    participant TreeModel as Tree Model
    participant Query as roots() Query

    Test->>TreeModel: Create root node
    Test->>Query: Call roots()
    Query-->>Test: Return SQL with ORDER BY lft
    Test->>Query: Fetch roots
    Query-->>Test: Return root nodes
    Test->>Test: Assert root node properties
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

In the garden of code where the trees gently sway,
Roots must be ordered, that’s what tests say.
By the left they now stand, in a neat little row,
Ensuring our queries are never too slow.
🐇🌳 Hooray for the lft—let the tree logic grow!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 phpcs (3.7.2)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php

Warning: PHP Startup: Invalid date.timezone value 'UTC', using 'UTC' instead in Unknown on line 0

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Class "Phar" not found in /usr/local/bin/phpcs:3
Stack trace:
#0 {main}
thrown in /usr/local/bin/phpcs on line 3


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29e2fbb and 66566e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (15)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: easy-coding-standard / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php (2)

193-241: LGTM! Well-structured test that effectively verifies the ordering behavior.

The test correctly validates that the roots() method includes proper ORDER BY lft clause when the tree attribute is disabled. The implementation follows good testing practices with clear setup, verification, and assertion phases.

The SQL string assertions are appropriate for this specific test case, ensuring the query includes the necessary ordering for deterministic results when multiple root nodes exist.


224-224: Good defensive programming practice.

The isset($roots[0]) check is a good defensive programming practice, even though the previous count assertion guarantees the element exists.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (29e2fbb) to head (66566e0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #41   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        90        90           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            470       470           
===========================================
  Hits             470       470           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot July 1, 2025 08:56
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request adds a new test case to verify that the roots() query correctly orders results by the left attribute when the tree attribute is disabled.

  • Added testRootsMethodRequiresLeftAttributeOrderingWhenTreeAttributeIsDisabled() to validate SQL query ordering.
  • The test verifies that the generated SQL includes an ORDER BY clause and that the left attribute is used for ordering.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

tests/NestedSetsQueryBehaviorTest.php:193

  • [nitpick] Consider adding a comment to clarify how the tree attribute is disabled in this test scenario. This will help maintain clarity on the specific precondition being verified.
    public function testRootsMethodRequiresLeftAttributeOrderingWhenTreeAttributeIsDisabled(): void

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw merged commit 580582c into main Jul 1, 2025
43 checks passed
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw deleted the fix-mini-35 branch July 1, 2025 08:57
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant