Skip to content

Conversation

terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jun 30, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new test to verify correct ordering of tree children based on their attributes.
    • Introduced a new XML test data file with intentionally unordered child nodes to validate tree traversal logic.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new test method was added to the NestedSetsBehaviorTest class to verify that the children() method correctly orders child nodes by their lft attribute. An accompanying XML fixture with intentionally disordered child nodes was introduced to support this test scenario.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php Added a test method to verify correct child node ordering by lft using a new XML fixture.
tests/support/data/test-disorder.xml Introduced an XML file with a tree structure having children in a non-sequential lft order for testing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant TestCase
    participant Database
    participant TreeModel

    TestCase->>Database: Initialize and load test-disorder.xml
    TestCase->>Database: Insert tree nodes (root and children)
    TestCase->>TreeModel: Retrieve root node (ID 1)
    TestCase->>TreeModel: Call children() on root node
    TreeModel->>Database: Query for children ORDER BY lft
    Database-->>TreeModel: Return children sorted by lft
    TreeModel-->>TestCase: Return ordered children
    TestCase->>TestCase: Assert children count and order
Loading

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

In the warren where data trees grow,
Rabbits test how the children should flow.
With lft and with rgt,
The order must be right—
Now Child B leads the show!
🐇🌳

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 phpcs (3.7.2)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d23ee64 and 0937cb7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/support/data/test-disorder.xml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/nested-sets-behavior#13
File: src/NestedSetsBehavior.php:145-145
Timestamp: 2025-06-29T11:22:41.839Z
Learning: The user terabytesoftw prefers to keep PRs focused and small, implementing enhancements in separate dedicated PRs rather than bundling multiple changes together.
🪛 PHPMD (2.15.0)
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php

2303-2303: Avoid using static access to class '\yii2\extensions\nestedsets\tests\support\model\Tree' in method 'testChildrenMethodRequiresOrderByForCorrectTreeTraversal'. (Clean Code Rules)

(StaticAccess)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.4-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit-compatibility / PHP 8.3-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.1-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/support/data/test-disorder.xml (1)

1-17: LGTM! Well-designed test fixture.

The XML structure correctly implements the test scenario with intentionally disordered child nodes. The nested sets values are mathematically correct, and the disorder between XML insertion order and logical lft order will effectively test the children() method's ordering behavior.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d23ee64) to head (0937cb7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #37   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity        90        90           
===========================================
  Files              2         2           
  Lines            469       469           
===========================================
  Hits             469       469           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw requested a review from Copilot June 30, 2025 16:12
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Adds a new XML fixture and test to verify that child nodes are returned in the correct lft order when input data is disordered.

  • Introduces test-disorder.xml with intentionally shuffled lft values.
  • Adds testChildrenMethodRequiresOrderByForCorrectTreeTraversal to the test suite.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
tests/support/data/test-disorder.xml New XML fixture containing disordered <tree> elements
tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php New test method inserting nodes from the fixture and asserting order
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:2289

  • The $element key in foreach over SimpleXMLElement->children() will be numeric, not the tag name, so the condition if ($element === 'tree') never passes. Consider iterating directly with foreach ($children->tree as $treeElement) or checking $treeElement->getName() === 'tree'.
        foreach ($children as $element => $treeElement) {

tests/NestedSetsBehaviorTest.php:2310

  • To ensure the test enforces ordering, chain an explicit orderBy(['lft' => SORT_ASC]) before ->all(), e.g. $root->children()->orderBy(['lft' => SORT_ASC])->all().
        $childrenList = $root->children()->all();

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant