Skip to content

Conversation

@terabytesoftw
Copy link
Member

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jul 30, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix? ✔️
New feature?
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added new tests to verify output buffer clearing and error response behavior when the error handler action is invalid.
    • Updated assertion messages for consistency and clarity in test output.
    • Removed certain type assertions to streamline test coverage.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 30, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new test was added to verify that ErrorHandler::clearOutput() properly clears all local output buffers. Assertion messages in StatelessApplicationTest were standardized with quoted attribute names, and a new test was introduced to check HTML error responses when the error handler's action is invalid. Some assertions about response object types were removed from ErrorHandlerTest.php. Additionally, code coverage ignore annotations were added around a fallback ob_clean() call in ErrorHandler::clearOutput().

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
ErrorHandler output buffer test and assertion cleanup
tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php
Removed assertions checking the response object's class type from existing tests. Added use function str_repeat; statement.
StatelessApplication assertion message updates & new tests
tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php
Standardized assertion messages to quote attribute names. Added testClearOutputCleansLocalBuffers to verify clearOutput() clears all local output buffers. Added testReturnHtmlErrorResponseWhenErrorHandlerActionIsInvalid to verify HTML error response when the error handler's action is invalid. Minor refactor to variable usage for clarity.
ErrorHandler code coverage annotation
src/http/ErrorHandler.php
Added // @codeCoverageIgnoreStart and // @codeCoverageIgnoreEnd annotations around a fallback ob_clean() call in clearOutput() method to exclude it from coverage metrics.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as TestCase
    participant EH as ErrorHandler

    Test->>EH: Start multiple output buffers
    Test->>EH: Call clearOutput()
    EH-->>Test: All output buffers cleared
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as TestCase
    participant App as StatelessApplication
    participant EH as ErrorHandler

    Test->>App: Request with invalid error handler action
    App->>EH: Handle error
    EH-->>App: Generate HTML error response with error details
    App-->>Test: Return 200 response with HTML error
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the warren of code, we test and we clear,
Buffers are emptied, no output to fear.
Quoted assertions, so tidy and neat,
New tests for errors—now bugs face defeat!
🐇✨
With every small hop, our coverage grows strong,
In the garden of code, where all tests belong.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2f4b81 and d039eb0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/http/ErrorHandler.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php (37 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/http/ErrorHandler.php
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php
  • tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.2-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix_mini_31

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.07%. Comparing base (432d2e3) to head (d039eb0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main      #43      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     94.37%   98.07%   +3.70%     
  Complexity      284      284              
============================================
  Files            12       12              
  Lines           729      728       -1     
============================================
+ Hits            688      714      +26     
+ Misses           41       14      -27     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 432d2e3 and 11f079b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php (1 hunks)
  • tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php (35 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/psr-bridge#6
File: tests/http/RequestTest.php:1536-1552
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T16:35:15.341Z
Learning: In the yii2-extensions/psr-bridge project, the base TestCase class already handles $_SERVER cleanup in setUp() and tearDown() methods, so individual test methods that extend TestCase don't need manual $_SERVER restoration.
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/psr-bridge#6
File: tests/http/RequestTest.php:1536-1552
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T16:35:15.341Z
Learning: In the yii2-extensions/psr-bridge project, the base TestCase class already handles $_SERVER cleanup in setUp() and tearDown() methods (lines 28 and 32), so individual test methods that extend TestCase don't need manual $_SERVER restoration.
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/psr-bridge#6
File: tests/http/RequestTest.php:1564-1578
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T16:33:57.495Z
Learning: The TestCase class in yii2-extensions/psr-bridge automatically handles $_SERVER superglobal cleanup by saving its original state before each test and restoring it afterward in setUp() and tearDown() methods. Manual $_SERVER cleanup in individual test methods is unnecessary when extending this TestCase.
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: yii2-extensions/psr-bridge#21
File: tests/http/PSR7ResponseTest.php:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T00:50:26.546Z
Learning: In yii2-extensions/psr-bridge, the ResponseAdapter::formatCookieHeader() method uses `$expire !== 1` to skip validation for Yii2's special deletion cookies, but this should be extended to handle all expired cookies, not just the special case where expire=1.
tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php (3)

Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: #6
File: tests/http/RequestTest.php:1536-1552
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T16:35:15.341Z
Learning: In the yii2-extensions/psr-bridge project, the base TestCase class already handles $_SERVER cleanup in setUp() and tearDown() methods (lines 28 and 32), so individual test methods that extend TestCase don't need manual $_SERVER restoration.

Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: #6
File: tests/http/RequestTest.php:1536-1552
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T16:35:15.341Z
Learning: In the yii2-extensions/psr-bridge project, the base TestCase class already handles $_SERVER cleanup in setUp() and tearDown() methods, so individual test methods that extend TestCase don't need manual $_SERVER restoration.

Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: #6
File: tests/http/RequestTest.php:1564-1578
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T16:33:57.495Z
Learning: The TestCase class in yii2-extensions/psr-bridge automatically handles $_SERVER superglobal cleanup by saving its original state before each test and restoring it afterward in setUp() and tearDown() methods. Manual $_SERVER cleanup in individual test methods is unnecessary when extending this TestCase.

tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php (1)

Learnt from: terabytesoftw
PR: #21
File: tests/http/PSR7ResponseTest.php:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-22T00:50:26.546Z
Learning: In yii2-extensions/psr-bridge, the ResponseAdapter::formatCookieHeader() method uses $expire !== 1 to skip validation for Yii2's special deletion cookies, but this should be extended to handle all expired cookies, not just the special case where expire=1.

🪛 GitHub Actions: build
tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php

[warning] 25-25: Risky test: Test code or tested code closed output buffers other than its own.

tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php

[error] 1389-1389: PHPUnit failure: Response 'body' does not contain expected error message '

Not Found: Page not found.
' during request handling in StatelessApplication.


[warning] 597-597: Risky test: Test code or tested code closed output buffers other than its own.


[warning] 1364-1364: Risky test: Test code or tested code closed output buffers other than its own.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: phpunit / PHP 8.3-windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: mutation / PHP 8.4-ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/http/ErrorHandlerTest.php (1)

15-21: Good addition of required function imports.

The new use function imports are appropriate for the new test method functionality, including buffer operations and the uopz extension check.

tests/http/StatelessApplicationTest.php (2)

65-66: LGTM! Assertion messages standardized for better consistency.

The addition of quotes around response attribute names ('status code', 'body', 'content-type') improves message consistency and readability across the test suite.

Also applies to: 120-121, 238-239, 250-251, 276-277, 352-353, 387-388, 420-421, 488-489, 661-662, 691-692, 721-722, 757-758, 764-765, 792-793, 799-800, 852-853, 861-862, 890-891, 900-901, 922-923, 949-950, 971-972, 982-984, 1004-1005, 1032-1033, 1062-1063, 1081-1082, 1121-1122, 1150-1151, 1169-1170, 1380-1381, 1391-1393, 1448-1449, 1467-1468, 1486-1487, 1505-1506


594-639: Ignore the suggested change—keep <pre> wrapper and HTML-escaped quotes

ErrorHandler::handleFallbackExceptionMessage() wraps the message in <pre> and uses htmlspecialchars(..., ENT_QUOTES), so quotes appear as &quot;. The existing assertion already matches that output and should remain unchanged.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

…tput buffer handling in `StatelessApplicationTest` class.
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw merged commit 358017a into main Jul 30, 2025
31 checks passed
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw deleted the fix_mini_31 branch July 30, 2025 23:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants