doc: updates about the check API (#378)

* doc: updates about the `check` API

* update

Author: ymc9

docs/guides/check-permission.md

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ You can still use the `check` API even if your access policies use these unsuppo
 
 ## Notes About Anonymous Context
 
-Access policy rules often use `auth()` and members of `auth()` (e.g., `auth().role`) in them. When a PrismaClient is enhanced in an anonymous context (calling `enhance` without context user object), neither `auth()` nor its members are unavailable. In such cases, the following evaluation rules apply:
+Access policy rules often use `auth()` and members of `auth()` (e.g., `auth().role`) in them. When a PrismaClient is enhanced in an anonymous context (calling `enhance` without context user object), neither `auth()` nor its members are available. In such cases, the following evaluation rules apply:
 
 - `auth() == null` evaluates to `true`.
 - `auth() != null` evaluates to `false`.

docs/reference/prisma-client-ext.md

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ The API is not supported on edge runtime (e.g., Cloudflare Workers or Vercel Edg
 
 #### Description
 
-Checks if the current user is allowed to perform the specified operation on the model based on the access policies in ZModel. The check is done via pure logical inference and doesn't query the database.
+Checks if the current user is allowed to perform the specified operation on the model based on the access policies in ZModel. The check is done via pure logical inference and doesn't query the database. It currently only deals with model-level policies and field-level ones are ignored.
 
 Please refer to [Checking Permissions Without Hitting the Database](../guides/check-permission) for more details.