Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Oct 24, 2025

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 24, 2025 02:17
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR bumps the version of the @zenstackhq/server package from 3.0.0-beta.12 to 3.0.0-beta.13.

  • Version increment from beta.12 to beta.13

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ymc9 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56b68ab and c742fce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/server/package.json (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/bump-server-version

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job


PR Review: Server Package Version Bump

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the changed package.json file
  • Review version bump appropriateness and semver compliance
  • Check for any related files that might need updates
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback on code quality, bugs, performance, security, and test coverage

Code Review Summary

This PR performs a straightforward version bump of the @zenstackhq/server package from 3.0.0-beta.12 to 3.0.0-beta.13. Here's my detailed analysis:

Code Quality & Best Practices

  • Clean Change: The modification is precise and follows semver conventions for beta releases
  • Consistent Versioning: All other packages in the monorepo are already at 3.0.0-beta.13, so this brings the server package into alignment
  • Proper Package Structure: The package.json maintains proper structure with correct exports, dependencies, and metadata

Version Alignment Analysis

After checking the repository, I found that:

  • The root package and 18 other packages are already at 3.0.0-beta.13
  • This change brings @zenstackhq/server into version alignment with the rest of the monorepo
  • Recent commit history shows this follows the pattern from commit 67f2368 which bumped the main version to 3.0.0-beta.13

No Security Concerns

  • Version bump changes pose no security risks
  • No dependency modifications or new attack vectors introduced
  • Package continues to use workspace dependencies appropriately

No Performance Impact

  • Pure metadata change with no runtime implications
  • No code modifications that could affect performance

No Bugs or Issues Detected

  • Simple version string update with no logic changes
  • No breaking changes or compatibility issues expected
  • Package.json syntax and structure remain valid

📝 Minor Observations

  1. Missing PR Description: While not a code issue, adding a brief description explaining why this specific package needed a separate version bump would improve documentation

  2. Timing Context: This appears to be a follow-up to the recent migration work in PR feat(server): migrate rpc api handler and express adapter #328 ("feat(server): migrate rpc api handler and express adapter"), suggesting this version bump aligns with that feature addition

Test Coverage

  • No new tests needed for version metadata changes
  • Existing test suite should continue to pass without modifications
  • Version alignment reduces potential integration issues in testing

🎯 Recommendation: APPROVE

This is a clean, necessary version bump that:

  • Brings the server package into alignment with the monorepo versioning
  • Follows proper semver conventions
  • Introduces no risks or breaking changes
  • Maintains package.json best practices

The change is straightforward and appropriate for merging.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 1c0a7f1 into dev Oct 24, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants